May 17th

WHO SPOIL OUR FEILD ( Aircraft Maintenance Engineering)?

By Manisha Kapoor
AS YOU KNOW AFTER FINISHING COURSE WE HAVE TO WORK UNPAID OR WE GET VRY LITTLE AMOUNT OF SALARY? AS IN OTHER FEILD EVEN STIPEND IS VRY MUCH HIGER THEN OUR STARTING SALARY THEN WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS??

  1. OUR SENIORS-THEY WERE READY TO WORK UNPAID.
  2. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
  3. AME SCHOOLS
  4. GOVT & PRIVATE AIRLINES(ORGANISATION)
  5. DGCA
  6. PLEASE WRITE YOUR COMMENTS

HERE ARE FEW COMMENTS RECEIVED TO THIS QUESTION ON AMEVOICE ORKUT COMMUNITY--

  1. Aviation field is corrupted by Air force people because......they just entering into aviation and showing blady experience,and that's a great effect to young guns in the interviews............
Jul 24th

Project 903 Lun – World Largest Airplane

By Manisha Kapoor
Project 903 Lun – World Largest Airplane

1987 was the year when the first 350 tons ground effect “ship” from the series of Soviet battle missile carriers was produced. It was called Lun after the Russian name for a bird of prey – hen harrier. Another name for this vehicle was Project 903. It carried 6 Moskit cruise missiles (SS-N-22 Sunburn in NATO classification). Hitting four of them causes inevitable sinking of a vessel of any know type and size. The second Lun-class battle aircraft was supposed to be produced in several years but due to the end of cold war and partial disarmament the project was changed to a rescue aircraft and it was never finished.

Project-903-Lun-1.jpg

This type of vehicle called in Russian ekranoplan uses so called ground effect – extra lift of large wings when in proximity to the surface. For this reason they have been designed to travel at a maximum of three meters above the sea but at the same time could provide take off, stable “flight” and safe “landing” in conditions of up to 5-meter waves. These crafts were originally developed by the Soviet Union as high-speed military transports, and were based mostly on the shores of the Caspian Sea and Black Sea. In 2005 crafts of this type have been classified by the International Marine Organization so they probably should be considered flying ships rather than swimming planes. It is also interesting to note that this aircraft is one of the largest ever built, with a length of 73,8 meters (comparing with 73 of Airbus A380).

Project-903-Lun-2.jpg 
Project-903-Lun-3.jpg 
 Project-903-Lun-4.jpg

Project-903-Lun-5.jpg
Project-903-Lun-7.jpg
Project-903-Lun-8.jpg
Project-903-Lun-9.jpg
Project-903-Lun-10.jpg
Project-903-Lun-11.jpg
Project-903-Lun-12.jpg
Project-903-Lun-14.jpg
Project-903-Lun-15.jpg
Project-903-Lun-16.jpg
Project-903-Lun-17.jpg





Wing-In-Ground (WIG) effect craft take advantage the fact that the aerodynamic efficiency of a wing, and particularly its lifting capacity, improves dramatically when is operated within approximately one-half of its span above ground or water, in what is termed ground effect. If the wing’s natural accelerated flow passing over it is further accelerated by the high-velocity exhaust of a turbojet engine, the lifting capacity of the wing is even more greatly enhanced. In 1966 the Central Hydrofoil Design Bureau under Rostislav Alekseev produced a gargantuan "ekranoplan" ("surface plane") combining the smooth hull form of a ship with stub wings, a large vertical fin and horizontal tail. The craft featured ten engines: eight mounted in two clusters of four directly behind the cockpit to provide augmented lift, and two on the vertical fin to provide cruise power. This machine, which American intelligence organizations dubbed the Caspian Sea Monster, could lift 540 tons and cruise at over 300 mph at an altitude of over 10 feet.

Alekseev developed a smaller military WIG, the Lun ("Dove"), armed with six large antishipping cruise missiles perched unaerodynamically on its back. In 1989 the missile launcher ekranoplane "Lun" (about 400 tons) was enlisted in the Navy. The ship was armed by three pairs of cruise missile 3M80 or 80M "Mosquito" (NATO's designation SS-N-22 Sunburn), though they were never deployed to fighting units. The design provided an effective method of performing a premptive strike against an enemy fleet.

The apparent success of these machines hid some very real problems, not least of which were serious stability and control deficiencies, as well as tremendous power requirements to get off the water. Under low flying conditions radar sensors measuring altitude, tilt and velocity of craft trace the variable profile of wave disturbance practically without averaging, thus making it difficult to gauge the motion parameters in relation to the undisturbed level of the sea surface. It is necessary to combine radar with other sensors in order to provide high accuracy. It has a massive turning circle, and is fairly slow to accelerate. Its poor manoeuverability means it cannot turn and run from a fight, and so is a fairly easy target if caught in a confined space, or if surrounded and pushed against the shoreline.

In 1989, after the tragic accident on nuclear submarine "Komsomolets" where 42 mariners died, the decision was made to re-equipment the second "Lun", being at that time under construction, into a search-and-rescue maritime ekranoplane "Spasatel". The second copy of "Lun" had 6 engines, instead of 8. A considerable part of the work had already been accomplished by the time of the breakup of the Soviet Union, followin which there was a drastic reduction of the budget of the Russian Navy. 



Designer: Central Design Bureau "TsKB po SPK" n.a. R.E.Alekseyev
Builder: Shipbuilding Plant "Volga", Nizhni Novgorod, Russia 
Take off weight: 400 tons (882,000 lbs)
Length: 73.8 m (240 ft)
Span: 44.0 m (144 ft)
Height: 19.2 m (65 ft)
Speed at cruise flight: 450-550 km/h (243-297 kts) 
Speed in displacement position: 20-100 km/h (10.8-54 kts)
Range of flight: 3,000 km (1,620 nm)
Range in displacement position: 400 km (216 nm)
Sea endurance: 5 days 
Cruise altitude: 1-5 m (3.3 - 16 ft)
Altitude of flight at search: 500 m (1,640 ft)
Max altitude of flight: 7500 m (24,600 ft)
Max waves height at take off and landing: 2.5-3.5 m (8.2-11.5 ft)
Max waves height at flight: unlimited
Powerplant: eight NK-87 turbofans of 13 tons (28,660 lbs) trust each
Crew: 9 plus 19 rescuer
Max number of saved people: 150-500 (among them 70 - cot case)

 
May 20th

Where do we stand now?

By AMEVoice Administrator
This blog is started by DEEPRAJ BHATTACHARYA.  I have just moved his blog in Right place......Click  here to visit his profile    DEEPRAJ BHATTACHARYA



Dear All,
           In todays world, it is always better to have a professional  qualification because you always get an edge over others. But where do we stand now? After 3 years of rigorous classroom & practical training ( in my time it was 3 & 1/2 yrs) you have to run from post to pillars to get an apprenticeship. After completion of that(If you are lucky enough to get one), you are again running from pillars to postbut this time only for a job in any airline.Because we don't have any other place to go. After all these years we get a certificate approved by DGCA,thats all. It is neither a degree, nor a diploma.So our basic qualification remains 10+2(unless someone has done his graduation).
Oct 9th

A poem tribute to a maintenance man...

By Vinay Lamba
There was thousands of little renown,
And these were the men, who worked on the planes,
But kept their feet on the ground
We all know the name of Lindbergh,
And we’ve read of his flight of fame,
But think, if you can, of his maintenance man,
Can you remember his name?............ (mechanic and technician)

Pilots are highly trained people
And wings are not easily won….
But without the work of the maintenance man
Our pilots are totally torn and worn,
So when you see mighty aircraft,
As they mark their way through the air,
The grease stained man with the wrench in his
Hand is the man who put them there.






Mar 13th

Are you appearing for EASA exams first time?

By AMEVoice Administrator

What is the EASA-66 licence?

In aircraft maintenance personnel must be licensed to sign an aircraft airworthy. Most countries have or had their national maintenance licence. In the US there is still the A&P license. In the EU the member states created a common licence which is the JAR-66 licence. They were setting new standards which have been followed by many countries throughout the world.  From  28 September 2003 on the EASA - European Safety Agency  became responsible for the airworthyness standards for the majority of civil aircraft registered in the EU member states.

The important subjects for maintenance are now EASA-145 , EASA-66 and EASA part-M  see below!

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD MORE DETAIL ABOUT EASA PART 66 EXAMS but first read every thing mention here.....

General Information about the EASA part 66 Licence!

(Part-66)  66.1
For the purpose of this Part, the competent authority shall be the authority designated by the Member State to whom a
person applies for the issuance of an aircraft maintenance licence.
SECTION A
SUBPART A
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE AEROPLANES AND HELICOPTERS
66.A.1 Scope
(a) This section establishes the requirements for the issue of an aircraft maintenance licence and conditions of its validity
and use, for aeroplanes and helicopters of the following categories:
— Category A
— Category B1
— Category B2
— Category C
(b) Categories A and B1 are subdivided into subcategories relative to combinations of aeroplanes, helicopters, turbine
and piston engines. The subcategories are:
— A1 and B1.1 Aeroplanes Turbine
— A2 and B1.2 Aeroplanes Piston
— A3 and B1.3 Helicopters Turbine
— A4 and B1.4 Helicopters Piston
66.A.10 Application
An application for an aircraft maintenance licence or amendment to such licence shall be made on EASA Form 19 and
in a manner established by the competent authority and submitted thereto. An application for the amendment to an
aircraft maintenance licence shall be made to the competent authority that issued the aircraft maintenance licence.
66.A.15 Eligibility
An applicant for an aircraft maintenance licence shall be at least 18 years of age.
66.A.20 Privileges
(a) Subject to compliance with paragraph (b), the following privileges shall apply:
1. A category A aircraft maintenance licence permits the holder to issue certificates of release to service following
minor scheduled line maintenance and simple defect rectification within the limits of tasks specifically endorsed
on the authorisation. The certification privileges shall be restricted to work that the licence holder has personally
performed in a Part-145 organisation.
2. A category B1 aircraft maintenance licence shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service
following maintenance, including aircraft structure, powerplant and mechanical and electrical systems. Replacement
of avionic line replaceable units, requiring simple tests to prove their serviceability, shall also be included in
the privileges. Category B1 shall automatically include the appropriate A subcategory.
3. A category B2 aircraft maintenance licence shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service
following maintenance on avionic and electrical systems.
4. A category C aircraft maintenance licence shall permit the holder to issue certificates of release to service
following base maintenance on aircraft. The privileges apply to the aircraft in its entirety in a Part-145 organisation.
(b) The holder of an aircraft maintenance licence may not exercise certification privileges unless:
1. in compliance with the applicable requirements of Part-M and/or Part-145.
2. in the preceding two-year period he/she has, either had six months of maintenance experience in accordance with
the privileges granted by the aircraft maintenance licence or, met the provision for the issue of the appropriate
privileges.
3. he/she is able to read, write and communicate to an understandable level in the language(s) in which the technical
documentation and procedures necessary to support the issue of the certificate of release to service are written.
66.A.25 Basic knowledge requirements
Jan 9th

Earth’s magnetic pole shifts, screws up runway at Florida airport

By Saurabh Vats

Earth’s magnetic pole shifts, screws up runway at Florida airport




An airport in Tampa, Florida, has had to temporarily close its runways to keep up with Earth's magnetic north pole, which is drifting toward Russia at a rate of 40 miles per year.

Fox News reports that the international airport was forced to adjust the signs on its busiest runway Thursday because pilots depend on the magnetic fields to navigate. The runway will be closed until Jan. 13, and will re-open with new taxiway signs that indicate its new location on aviation charts, the Tampa Bay Tribune reports.

Paul Takemoto, a spokesman for the FAA, says the Earth's magnetic fields are constantly in flux -- but rarely so much so that runway signage needs to be changed. "You want to be absolutely precise in your compass heading," he told Fox. "To make sure the precision is there that we need, you have to make these changes."

[Rewind: Scary gaffe adds to week of airline mishaps]

"The Earth's poles are changing constantly, and when they change more than three degrees, that can affect runway numbering," FAA spokesperson Kathleen Bergen told Fox News. It's unclear whether any other airports will have to adjust their runways.

Earth's magnetic field, which still flummoxes those who study it, "is thought to be generated deep inside the planet," LiveScience writer Jeanna Bryner explains. "An inner core of solid iron is surrounded by an outer core of molten iron. They rotate at different rates, and the interaction between the regions creates what scientists call a 'hydromagnetic dynamo.' It's something like an electric motor, and it generates a magnetic field akin to a giant bar magnet."

 

 

Sometimes, the poles completely flip -- and presumably when that happens, many bigger changes are afoot than modest tweaks to airport signs. The last time the planet experienced a polarity flip was 780,000 years ago.

Oct 9th

Glass Cockpit

By Arpita jain

Glass Cockpit


boeing_777_cockpit2glass cockpit is an aircraft cockpit that features electronic instrument displays. Where a traditional cockpit relies on numerous mechanical gauges to display information, a glass cockpit utilizes several computer displays that can be adjusted to display flight information as needed. This simplifies aircraft operation and navigation and allows pilots to focus only on the most pertinent information. They are also highly popular with airline companies as they usually eliminate the need to employ a flight engineer.

DESCRIPTION

The primary component of the glass cockpit is the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), which displays all information regarding the aircraft’s situation, position and progress. Comprising left- and right-side primary flight display (PFD) and navigation display (nav) screens, EFIS primarily covers horizontal and vertical position, but also indicates time and speed. The second part of the glass cockpit, comprising over-and-under center display screens, shows the aircraft’s systems conditions and engines performance. This is variously called EICAS (Engine Indications and Crew Alerting System) or ECAM (Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor), the former being the Boeing term and the latter Airbus’ acronym. All this information is graphically presented in a ‘need-to-know’ basis, however the pilot may query the system for further details of interest.

antonow_an24_cockpitEarly glass cockpits, found in the Boeing 737 Classic, 757 and 767-200/-300, and in the Airbus A300-600 and A310, used EFIS to display attitude and navigational information only, with traditional mechanical gauges retained for airspeed, altitude and vertical speed. Later glass cockpits, found in the Boeing 747-400, 767-400, 777, A320, and later Airbuses, have replaced completely the numerous mechanical gauges and warning lights present in previous generation aircraft.

HISTORY

space_shuttle_cockpitPrior to the 1970s, air transport operations were not considered sufficiently demanding to require advanced equipment like electronic flight displays. Also, computer technology was not at a level where sufficiently light and powerful circuits were available. The increasing complexity of transport aircraft, the advent of digital systems and the growing air traffic congestion around airports began to change that.

The average transport aircraft in the mid-1970s had more than 100 cockpit instruments and controls, and the primary flight instruments were already crowded with indicators, crossbars, and symbols. In other words, the growing number of cockpit elements were competing for cockpit space and pilot attention. As a result, NASA conducted research on displays that could process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated, easily understood picture of the aircraft flight situation, culminating in a series of demonstration flights to demonstrate a full glass cockpit system.

The success of the NASA-led glass cockpit work is reflected in the total acceptance of electronic flight displays beginning with the introduction of the Boeing 767 in 1982. Airlines and their passengers alike have benefited. The safety and efficiency of flights have been increased with improved pilot understanding of the aircraft’s situation relative to its environment.

By the end of the 1990s, LCD display panels were increasingly favored among aircraft manufacturers because of their efficiency, reliability and legibility. Earlier CRT display panels suffered from poor legibility at some viewing angles and poor response times, making them unsuitable for aviation uses. Modern aircraft such as the Boeing 777, Boeing 787, and Boeing 747-400, Boeing 767-400ER, Airbus A320 family (enhanced version), Airbus A330, Airbus A340 , Airbus A380 and Airbus A350 are fitted with glass cockpits consisting of liquid crystal display (LCD) units


 

The glass cockpit has become standard equipment in airliners, business jets, and military aircraft, and was even fitted into NASA’s Space Shuttle orbiters Atlantis, Columbia, Discovery, and Endeavour, and the current Russian Soyuz TMA model spacecraft that was launched in 2002. By the end of the century glass cockpits began appearing in general aviation aircraft as well. By 2005, even basic trainers like the Piper Cherokee and Cessna 172 were shipping with glass cockpits as options (which nearly all customers chose), and many modern aircraft such as the Diamond Aircraft twin-engine travel and training aircraft DA42 are only available with glass cockpit.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Unlike the previous era of glass cockpits-where designers merely copied the look and feel of conventional electromechanical instruments onto cathode ray tubes-the new displays represent a true departure. They look and behave a lot like computers with windows and data that can be manipulated with point-and-click devices. They also add terrain, approach charts, weather, vertical displays, and 3D navigation images.

The improved concepts enables aircraft makers to customize cockpits to a greater degree than previously. All of the manufacturers involved have chosen to do so in one way or another-such as using a trackball, thumb pad or joystick as a pilot-input device in a computer-style environment. Many of the modifications offered by the aircraft manufacturers improve situational awareness and customize the man-machine interface to enhance safety.

As aircraft displays have modernized, the sensors that feed them have modernized as well. Traditional gyroscopic flight instruments have been replaced by Attitude and Heading Reference Systems (AHRS) and Air Data Computers (ADCs), improving reliability and reducing cost and maintenance. GPS receivers are frequently integrated into glass cockpits.

All new airliners such as the Airbus A380, the Boeing 787 and private jets such as Dassault Falcon 900 and Eclipse 500 use glass cockpits. Certain general aviation aircraft, such as the 4-seat Diamond Aircraft DA40, DA42 and DA50 and the 4-seat Cirrus Design SR20 and SR22, are available only with glass cockpits. Systems such as the Garmin G1000 are now available on many new GA aircraft, including the classic Cessna 172.

Glass cockpits are also very popular as a retrofit for older, private jets such as Dassault Falcons, Raytheon Hawkers, Bombardier Challengers, Cessna Citations, Gulfstreams, King Airs, Learjets, Astras and many others. Aviation service companies work closely with equipment manufacturers to address the needs of the owners of these aircraft.

Oct 9th

Airplane Mechanic Sucked Into Jet Engine

By Saurabh sharma
SAFETY IS PRIORITY

Worker killed during maintenance check in El PasoThe Associated PressEL PASO — An airplane mechanic was killed Monday morning after he was sucked into a jet's engine while passengers were boarding from the tarmac, officials said.

"A mechanic walked in front of the engine and was pulled into the engine," National Transportation Safety Board spokeswoman Lauren Peduzzi said.
She said she didn't know if any passengers saw the accident as they boarded Continental Airlines flight 1515 to Houston. A Federal Aviation Administration spokesman said the worker was sucked into the right engine of the 737-500.

The mechanic's identity wasn't released, but Continental identified the victim as an employee of one of Continental's suppliers. Continental released few other details about what it called a "ground incident" at El Paso International Airport.

"My fellow co-workers and I extend our heartfelt sympathies to the family and friends of the mechanic involved in this tragic event," Larry Kellner, Continental chairman and CEO, said in a statement.
There were 114 passengers and five crew members boarding the plane.
Peduzzi said there had been an earlier problem with the Number 2 engine, so the engine's metal covering was open at the time of the accident.

The NTSB was investigating. 

image001.jpg 

image002.jpg 

image003.jpg 

image004.jpg 
image007.jpg
image010.jpg
image006.jpg


 



Remember one thing  "
SAFETY IS PRIORITY"

That is very fine; but it is impossible to make the men perfect; the men will always remain the same as they are now; and no legislation will make a man have more presence of mind, or, I believe, make him more cautious; and besides that, the next time such an accident occurs, the circumstances will be so different, that the instructions given to the men, in consequence of the former accident, will not apply.


In flying I have learned that carelessness and overconfidence are usually far more dangerous than deliberately accepted risks.
 
Jul 23rd

Before Radar – This Is How It Was Done

By Saurabh sharma

Before Radar – This Is How It Was Done


  • 0
     
    Share

We all know that a RADAR is used to detect the position of aircraft using radio waves. The term RADAR was first coined in 1941 and stands for RAdio Detection And Ranging. Before the invention of RADAR there was obviously a need to detect enemy aircraft. So what do you think they did? See pictures below…

So basically they just used these contraptions to make their ears bigger to pick up the sound waves in the air. Makes you wonder if they had any false alarms when a bumble bee flew close by. Gives a whole new meaning to “Put your ears on good buddy” 

Jul 25th

Gravity powered aircraft flies with no fuel

By Aman Kumar

The Gravity-Powered Aircraft

The Fuelless Gravity Plane ConceptThe Fuelless Gravity Plane ConceptOur world is certainly not left wanting for free sources of energy. The sun vomits an absurd amount of energy upon the Earth’s surface constantly– up to a thousand watts per square meter during the daytime; the planet’s mantle writhes with heat energy, up to 4,000 degrees Celcius; and a tremendous supply of energy saturates the entire planet in the form of gravity. The difficulty has always been in finding ways to capture such energy usefully. Solar panels have had some success snatching up sunlight for conversion to electricity, geothermal installations use the earth’s heat to create power, and hydroelectric plants tap the potential energy of gravity. Currently a Nevada-based aviation company is exploring another creative way to utilize gravity as a power source– combining some very old ideas with some very new ones– to produce an aircraft concept which might one day tote people and cargo great distances without the need for fuel. The project is called the GravityPlane.

The idea sprung from the brain of Robert D. Hunt, a theoretical physicist and inventor who founded Hunt Aviation to develop his patented “gravity powered hybrid aircraft” concept which operates on the principles of buoyancy, aerodynamic lift, and gravity. It uses a cycle of climbing and descending to maintain its lift and forward speed, mimicking the behavior of the bodies of warm and cold air which make up the weather.

In order for the GravityPlane to become airborne, gas bags inside a pair of rigid, zeppelin-like structures are filled with helium from storage tanks inside the vehicle. This causes the aircraft to become lighter-than-air, and it rises from the ground. Compressed-air jets on the sides of the craft add further propulsion, pushing the vehicle skyward and decreasing the craft’s overall weight by releasing the stored air which acts as ballast. Once the craft reaches the altitude where the helium is no longer lighter than the surrounding air– theoretically as high as ten miles up– it is unable to climb any further. Some of the stored compressed air is then expanded into the dirigible areas, decreasing the buoyancy effect of the helium and starting the aircraft’s descent phase.

As gravity pulls the plane towards the earth, the long wings are moved to the swept-back position to reduce wind drag, and air turbines mounted on the top of the craft capture some of the forward momentum and use it to drive air pumps which can refill the on-board compressed air storage tanks. In this gliding mode, the aircraft achieves aerodynamic lift for a gradual descent at high speeds, and can travel in this configuration for about 400 to 600 miles. At the end of the gliding phase, the wings are redeployed. The compressed air can once again be forced out through the compressed air jets, pushing the vehicle upwards and increasing the vehicle’s buoyancy to lighter-than-air once again, beginning the cycle anew. This process can be repeated as many times as needed to cover the required distance.

Left-to-Right: Joe Chomko (Vice President), Robert D. Hunt (Inventor), and Gene Cox (President)Left-to-Right: Joe Chomko (Vice President), Robert D. Hunt (Inventor), and Gene Cox (President)

If the concept ever leaves the drawing board and becomes a prototype, it will be massive. Much like the zeppelins of old, the volume of helium needed requires a very large gas bag area. But hypothetically, this design could allow the aircraft to travel practically any distance with no fuel. It would expel no polluting gasses, and it would be virtually silent. It would also have some interesting features for such a large craft, including vertical take-off and landing (VTOL), and the ability to set down on land or at sea. Additionally, its buoyancy would allow it to hover in the air if needed, even in the event of total power loss.

Considering the GravityPlane’s simplicity, its environmentally friendly propulsion, and its freedom from heavy and expensive fossil fuels, this concept could completely revolutionize aircraft design in the coming decades if it proves viable. And using non-flammable helium means that a Hindenburg-style disaster is not a risk. Can Hunt Aviation deliver the sparkling, rigid-airship future that zeppelins promised us so long ago? Time will tell.