Jan 26th

The Airbus A300-600ST Beluga - Massive Transport Airplane...

By Sandeep Kumar

The Airbus A300-600ST Beluga - Massive Transport Airplane...












































































































Oct 8th

Antonov An-124

By Rekha Behra

Antonov An-124 Ruslan Details



anatov_an_124_ruslanThe Antonov An-124 Ruslan is the largest aircraft ever mass produced, and was, until the advent of the An-225 Mriya. The An-124 Ruslanis often used by western companies to transport over-sized cargoes such as dam turbines to unusual and distant locations.

Anatov AN 124 RuslanThe An-124 is equipped with large loading doors at the rear end of the cargo compartment. The aircraft is currently serviced by, among other companies, Russian cargo company Volga-Dnepr which has been contracting with Boeing for delivery of outsize aircraft components to Boeing’s Everett plant. The civil version of the AN-124-100 was designed on the basis of AN-124 Ruslan heavy military transport aircraft having the biggest cargo capacity among all serially produced aircraft of the world. An-124s have been used to carry locomotives, yachts, aircraft fuselages, and a variety of other oversized cargoes. Antonov Airlines is a cargo airline based in Kiev, Ukraine. The AN-124 has been used to deliver 90 t hydraulic turbines, the Liebherr large dimension truck crane, the USA Euclid mine truck, the fuselage of the Tu-204 passenger aircraft, the 109 t locomotive, the General Electric GE90 aircraft engines, various combat vehicles, the Lynx anti-submarine helicopters, the spaceship in capsule and other unique cargoes. Like the military An-124s, the An-124-100M is able to carry 148 tonnes (326,192lb) of cargo, 28 tonnes (61,712lb) more than the standard An-124-100.

Specifications of the Anatov AN 124 Ruslan:

  • Crew: 6
  • Capacity: 88 passengers
  • Payload: 150,000 kg (330,000 lb)
  • Length: 68.96 m (226 ft 3 in)
  • Wingspan: 73.3 m (240 ft 5 in)
  • Height: 20.78 m (68 ft 2 in)
  • Wing area: 628 m² (6,760 sq ft)
  • Empty weight: 175,000 kg (385,000 lb)
  • Loaded weight: 405,000 kg (892,000 lb)
  • Useful load: 230,000 kg (508,000 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 405,000 kg (893,000 lb)
  • Powerplant: 4× Ivchenko Progress D-18T turbofans, 229.5 kN (51,600 lbf) each

Performance of the Anatov AN 124 Ruslan

  • Maximum speed: 865 km/h (467 kn (537 mph))
  • Cruise speed: 800-850 km/h (430 kn (490 mph))
  • Range: 5,400 km (2,900 nm, 3,360 mi (5,410 km))
  • Service ceiling: 12,000 m (35,000 ft)
  • Wing loading: 365 kg/m² (74.7 b/sq ft)
  • Thrust/weight: 0.41
Oct 8th

Flying Boats

By Saurabh sharma

Flying Boats


 

Short S-23

Short S-23

flying boat is a specialised form of aircraft that is designed to take off from and land on water, using its fuselage as a floating hull. Such aircraft are sometimes stabilised on water by underwing floats or by wing-like projections from the fuselage. It is the use of the fuselage to provide the main buoyancy of the aircraft which distinguishes flying boats from floatplanes, which use one or more floats attached below the fuselage or the wings to keep the fuselage clear of the water.

 

Flying boats were some of the largest aircraft of the first half of the 20th century. Their ability to alight on water allowed them to break free of the size constraints imposed by general lack of large, land-based runways, and also made them important for maritime patrol and air-to-sea rescue, capabilities put to great use in World War II. Following World War II, their use gradually tailed off, with many of the roles taken over by land aircraft types.

 

Hughs Aircraft

Hughs Aircraft

In the 21st century, flying boats maintain a few niche uses, such as for dropping water on forest fires and for air transport around archipelagos.

 

HISTORY

ORIGINS

Curtiss NC Flying Boat “NC-3″ skims across the water before takeoff, 1919.In 1911 Curtiss unveiled a development of his earlier floatplane and landplane model D, this time fitted with a hull, and designated as the Model E. In 1913, the boat building firm J. Samuel White of West Cowes on the Isle of Wight, set up a new aircraft division and produced a flying boat. This was displayed at the London Air Show at Olympia in 1913[1]. In that same year, a collaboration between the S.E. Saunders boatyard of East Cowes on the Isle of Wight and the Sopwith Aviation Company produced their “Bat Boat”, an aircraft with a consuta laminated hull that could operate from land or on water [1]. The “Bat Boat” completed several landings on sea and on land and was duly awarded the Mortimer Singer Prize. It was the first all-British aeroplane capable of making six return flights over five miles within five hours.

Before World War I the American pioneer aviator Glenn Curtiss, who had been experimenting with floatplanes, joined with Englishman John Cyril Porte to design a flying boat that could take the prize offered by the British Daily Mail newspaper for the first aerial crossing of the Atlantic ocean. Porte developed a practical hull design with the distinctive ’step’ which could be married to Curtiss’ airframe and engine design. The resulting large aircraft would be able to carry enough fuel to fly long distances and could berth alongside ships for refuelling. The war interrupted Porte’s plans.

WORLD WAR I

From 1914 Curtis produced his “America” flying boat, several examples of which were acquired by the Royal Naval Air Service and tested at their Seaplane Experimental Station, now run by Porte. Porte developed an improved hull, resulting in the Felixstowe F.1 and its larger derivatives, used for coastal patrols and hunting U-boats.

The Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company independently developed its designs into the small model ‘F’, the larger model ‘K’ several of which were sold to the Russian Naval Air Service, and the Model ‘C’ for the US Navy. Curtiss among others also built the Felixstowe F5 as the Curtiss F5L, based on the final Porte hull designs and powered by American Liberty engines.

BETWEEN THE WARS

A Curtiss NC-4 became the first aircraft to fly across the Atlantic Ocean in 1919, crossing via the Azores. Of the four that were to make the attempt, only one completed the flight.

In the 1930s, flying boats made it possible to have regular air transport between the U.S. and Europe, opening up new air travel routes to South America, Africa, and Asia. Foynes, Ireland and Botwood, Newfoundland and Labrador were the termini for many early transatlantic flights. Where land-based aircraft lacked the required airfields to land, flying boats could stop at small island, river, lake or coastal stations to refuel and resupply. The Pan Am Boeing 314 “Clipper” planes brought exotic destinations like the Far East within reach of air travellers and came to represent the romance of flight.

In 1923, the first British commercial flying boat service was introduced with flights to and from the Channel Islands. The British aviation industry was experiencing rapid growth. The Government decided that nationalization was necessary and ordered five aviation companies to merge to form the state-owned Imperial Airways of London (IAL). IAL became the international flag-carrying British airline, providing flying boat passenger and mail transport links between Britain and South Africa using aircraft such as the Short S.8 Calcutta.

Supermarine SouthamptonIn 1928, a new world achievement in aviation attracted the attention of the Australian public when four Supermarine Southampton flying boats of the RAF Far-East flight arrived in Melbourne on a circumnavigation and flag-waving mission. The RAF crews were warmly welcomed by the waterside crowds, and the flight was considered proof that flying boats had evolved to become reliable means of long distance transport.

Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial Services, better known as Qantas, had been registered in Brisbane during November 1920. With good levels of public support for the new faster public transport and agreements to carry domestic mail, the outback airline grew. By 1931, Qantas was trialling land plane flights connecting with Imperial Airways services. Mail was now reaching London in just 16 days - less than half the time taken by sea.

Government tenders on both sides of the world invited applications to run new passenger and mail services between the ends of Empire, and Qantas and IAL were successful with a joint bid. A company under combined ownership was then formed, Qantas Empire Airways. The new ten day service between Sydney’s Rose Bay and Southampton was such a success with letter-writers that before long the volume of mail was exceeding aircraft storage space. A solution to the problem was found by the British Government, who in 1933 had requested aviation manufacturer Short Brothers to design a big new long-range monoplane for use by IAL. Partner Qantas agreed to the initiative and undertook to purchase six of the new Short S23 ‘C’ class or ‘Empire’ flying boats.

Delivering the mail as quickly as possible generated a lot of competition and some innovative solutions. A variant of the Short Empire flying boats, Maia and Mercury, was a strange-looking solution where a four-engined floatplane Mercury was fixed on top of Maia, a heavily modified Short Empire flying boat. The idea was to use the larger Maia to get the smaller Mercury (the winged messenger) off the ground at weights that would have been impossible otherwise, so that it could carry sufficient fuel for the trip. Unfortunately this limited the usefulness, and after crossing to New York the Mercury had to be returned by ship. The Mercury was to set a number of distance records before in-flight refuelling was adopted.

Sir Alan Cobham devised a method of in-flight refuelling in the 1930s, so that the Short Empire flying boats serving the transatlantic crossing could be refuelled over Foynes on the River Shannon in Ireland allowing them to carry more fuel than they could take off with, so as to enable them to make the trans-Atlantic flight[1]. A Handley Page H.P.54 Harrow was used as the fuel tanker

Dornier Do-X flyby over a seaport town in the Baltic 1930The German Dornier Do-X flying boat was noticeably different from its UK and US-built counterparts, using wing-like protrusions from the fuselage to stabilise on the water. It was powered by 12 engines and carried 170 persons. [1]. It flew to America in 1929 [1]crossing the Atlantic via an indirect route. It was the largest flying boat of its time but was severely underpowered and was limited by a very low operational ceiling. Only three were built with a variety of different engines installed, in an attempt to overcome the lack of power. Two of these were sold to Italy.

WORLD WAR II

The military value of flying boats was well recognized and every country bordering on water operated them in a military capacity at the outbreak of the war. They were utilized in various tasks from anti-submarine patrol to maritime search and rescue and gunfire spotting for battleships. Aircraft such as the PBY Catalina, Short Sunderland and Grumman Goose recovered downed airmen and operated as scout aircraft over the vast distances of the Pacific Theater and Battle of the Atlantic during World War II, as well as sinking numerous submarines, and finding enemy ships. The German battleship Bismarck was found during a routine patrol by a PBY Catalina.

The largest flying boat of the war was the Blohm und Voss Bv 238 which was also the heaviest plane to fly during the Second World War.

In November 1939, the structure of Imperial Airways was changed to create British European Airways and British Overseas Airways Corporation with the change being made official in 1 April 1940. BOAC continued to operate flying boat services from the (slightly) safer confines of Poole Harbour during wartime, returning to Southampton in 1947.

POST WORLD WAR II

Hughes H-4 Hercules.The Hughes H-4 Hercules in development in the U.S. during the war was even larger than the Bv238, but it did not fly until 1947. The “Spruce Goose”, as the H-4 was nicknamed, was the largest flying boat ever to fly. That short 1947 hop of the ‘Flying Lumberyard’ was to be its last however, a victim of post-war cutbacks and the disappearance of its intended mission as a transatlantic transport.

Following the end of World War II, the use of flying boats rapidly declined, though the U.S. Navy continued to operate such aircraft (notably the Martin P5M Marlin) until the early 1970s, even attempting to build a jet-powered seaplane bomber, the Martin Seamaster. Several factors contributed to the decline. The ability to land on water became less of an advantage owing to the considerable increase in the number and length of land based runways, whose construction had been driven by the needs of the allied forces during the Second World War. Further, as the speed and range of land-based aircraft increased, the commercial competitiveness of flying boats diminished, as their design compromised aerodynamic efficiency and speed to accomplish the feat of waterborne takeoff and alighting. Competing with new civilian jet aircraft like the de Havilland Comet and Boeing 707 was impossible.

BOAC continued to operate their flying boat services out of Southampton until November 1950.

Bucking the trend, in 1948, Aquila Airways was founded to serve destinations that were still inaccessible to land based aircraft. This company operated Short S.25 and Short S.45 flying boats out of Southampton on routes to Madeira, Las Palmas, Lisbon, Jersey, Majorca, Marseilles, Capri, Genoa, Montreux and Santa Margherita. The airline ceased operations on 30th September 1958 .

From 1950 to 1957, Aquila Airways also operated a service from Southampton to Edinburgh and Glasgow.

The flying boats of Aquila Airways were also chartered for one-off trips, usually to deploy troops where scheduled services didn’t exist or where there were political considerations. Three Aquila flying boats were used during the Berlin Airlift. The longest charter, in 1952, was from Southampton to the Falkland Islands. In 1953 the flying boats were chartered for troop deployment trips to Freetown and Lagos and there was a special trip from Hull to Helsinki to relocate a ships crew.

Saunders-Roe Princess G-ALUNThe technically advanced Saunders-Roe Princess first flew in 1952 and later received a certificate of airworthiness. Despite being the pinnacle of flying boat development, none were sold, despite Aquila Airways reportedly attempting to buy them. Of the three Princess that were built, two never flew and all were scrapped in 1967

Helicopters ultimately took over the flying boat air-sea rescue role.

The land-based P-3 Orion and carrier-based S-3 Viking became the US Navy’s fixed-wing anti-submarine patrol aircraft.

Ansett flew a flying boat service from Rose Bay, New South Wales to Lord Howe Island until 1974.

MODERN VERSIONS

The shape of the Short Empire was a harbinger of the shape of later aircraft yet to come, and the type also contributed much to the designs of later ekranoplans. However, true flying boats have largely been replaced by seaplanes with floats and amphibian aircraft with wheels. The Beriev Be-200 twin-jet amphibious aircraft has been one of the closest ‘living’ descendants of the flying-boats of old, along with the larger amphibious planes used for fighting forest fires. There are also several experimental/kit amphibians such as the Volmer Sportsman, Glass Goose, the LSA SeaMax, Aeroprakt A-24, and the Seawind.

The ShinMaywa US-2 (Japanese: ??? US-2) are large STOL aircraft designed for air-sea rescue (SAR) work. US-2 is operated by Japan Self Defense Force.

The Canadair CL-215 and successor Canadair CL-415 are also examples of modern flying boats and are used for forest fire suppression.

Oct 2nd

Lockheed-Martin’s Mystery Airship- P791

By Saurabh Vats

Lockheed Martin Advanced Development Projects is making perhaps the first realistic tests of a hybrid airship–a concept that dates back many decades but that is just now being tried at a significant scale. The Skunk Works had secretly built the craft and hoped for a quiet first flight at its Palmdale, Calif., facility, but a few passers-by noticed the strange object in the sky. The Defense Dept. is showing interest in two categories of airships–those that can carry large cargo at low altitude, exemplified by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) Walrus program, and those that can operate in high-altitude low-wind conditions and remain on station for long periods of time. The configuration of the Skunks Works ship indicates it is the former–a hybrid heavy-load carrier. The interest is across the services and the notional applications are diverse, ranging from logistics–delivery of an integrated fighting unit within theater, for example–to sensor, communications and even laser-weapon relay platforms. But airships aren’t there yet. Major unresolved issues could derail the airship dream, such as their traditional delicate ground handling, and possibly prohibitive economics and vulnerability. These issues have been debated endlessly on paper, and now Lockheed Martin, a prime airship proponent, is investing to seek real answers.

A hybrid airship derives most of its lift by being filled with a lighter-than-air gas such as helium. Overall, it is heavier than air and gains the final 20% or so of lift by flying like an aircraft, but with slow takeoff and landing speeds that allow operations from short unprepared strips. The Skunk Works made the first flight of its “P-791″ testbed on Jan. 31 at its facility on the Palmdale Air Force Plant 42 airport. The manned flight was about a 5-min. circuit around the airport in the morning and appeared to be successful. The company did not announce or want to discuss the flight. The P-791 is not part of a government contract, but rather an independent research and development project by the Skunk Works to better understand airship capabilities and technologies, such as materials, a company official says. However, it may also be a quarter-scale prototype of a heavy-lifter.

TO GAIN MORE SPAN TO ACT LIKE a wing, the P-791 is three pressurized lobes joined together. An observer of the first flight says it was about the size of three Fuji blimps blended together. The Fuji blimp, a Skyship 600 model, is 206 ft. long. That suggests the P-791 would have a gross lift of roughly 3-5 tons. The observer saw the craft performing very tight 360-deg. turns while taxiing. It made a brief takeoff roll, climbed to a low altitude, made a few banks–including a long sweeping turn–then came back and landed. The landing approach had a nose-down body attitude that levelled for the flare. The flight was very smooth, the observer says. The craft was flown by P-791 Chief Test Pilot Eric P. Hansen. The speed of the testbed was estimated at about 20 kt. A full-scale version would be able to go much faster, over 100 kt. Lockheed Martin has long proposed a large transport airship, at one time called the Aerocraft, which was halted around 2000 (AW&ST Feb. 22, 1999, p. 26). That design was about 800 ft. long and was to carry 1-1.2 million lb. at 125 kt. The Skunk Works was one of two contractors to receive one-year, $3-million Darpa contracts in August 2005 to study Walrus. The second Walrus phase would be a three-year demonstration effort.

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE VIDEO

 


Oct 1st

Russian Flying Fortresses

By Aman Kumar

Russian Flying Fortresses

 

In 1930s Russian army was … by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet.

Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.

Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times.

Russian flying fortress 15


 

Russian flying fortress 2

 

Russian flying fortress 3

 

Russian flying fortress 4

 

Russian flying fortress 5

 

Russian flying fortress 6

 

Russian flying fortress 7

 

Russian flying fortress 8

 

Russian flying fortress 9

 

Russian flying fortress 10

 

Russian flying fortress 11

 

Russian flying fortress 12

 

Russian flying fortress 13

 

Russian flying fortress 14

 

Russian flying fortress 16

 

 

 



 
Sep 29th

Eurocopter unveils new-look helicopter

By AMEVoice Administrator

Eurocopter unveils new-look helicopter

The Eurocopter's X3 high-speed hybrid helicopter demonstrator is seen at the Istres flight testing center

MARSEILLE, France (Reuters) – European group Eurocopter showed off a revolutionary winged helicopter on Monday, in a bid to counter U.S. rival Sikorsky's efforts to break the speed barrier by rewriting rotorcraft design rules.

The X3 hybrid helicraft -- which combines forward-facing propellers astride two short aircraft wings with the familiar overhead rotor blades seen on any normal helicopter -- was unveiled following months of secrecy.

The half-plane, half-helicopter design aims to overcome chronic obstacles to high-speed helicopter flight by combining the advantages of fixed-wing aircraft with those of a standard helicopter -- allowing it to fly at 220 knots or 400 km/hour.

The move by the world's largest civil helicopter maker came less than two weeks after United Technologies unit Sikorsky claimed an unofficial speed record of 250 knots (460 km/hour) with its own avant-garde prototype called X2.

 

Click image to see photos of Eurocopter's X3 high-speed helicopter



AP/Eurocopter/Patrick Penna

Today's helicopters typically cruise around 130-40 knots.

 

Eurocopter, part of European aerospace group EADS, said its X3 hoverplane, sporting black-and-white striped propellers, had first flown on September 6 at a closely guarded military test base.

"We just wanted a place where we knew we were alone, no plane spotters," Eurocopter chief executive Lutz Bertling told Reuters, adding Eurocopter had paid the French defense ministry for the right to use army facilities even though the project was so far funded entirely out of the company's research budget.

Sikorsky's X2 made its maiden flight in 2008.

In an operation echoing the secrecy of the project itself, reporters were briefed at Eurocopter headquarters, transported to one base by helicopter and bussed to another where no-one except test crew had seen the new hoverplane, sitting in an isolated hangar after its first flight three weeks ago.

The announcement confirmed the existence of the X3 for the first time after Reuters reported Eurocopter's plans to unveil it on Friday, ending months of speculation.

NO TAIL ROTOR

The extraordinary secrecy reflected fierce competition between helicopter makers to deliver more speed without losing efficiency, a potential source of future profit.

Under current helicopter designs, rotor tips approach supersonic speeds when pushed to fly too fast and this can threaten the stability of the base of the rotor, executives said.

Helicopter makers have devoted years of research to solving the problem, but typically the faster a helicopter flies, the less efficient it is when hovering and vice-versa.

The Sikorsky solution features two main rotors atop the cabin, which spin in opposite directions. That both neutralizes the spinning force applied to a traditional single-main-rotor helicopter and provides a speed boost.

One thing the European and U.S. machines have in common is their new design eliminates the need for the sideways tail rotor used to stabilize traditional helicopters.

Bertling said the X3 concept would be more cost-efficient for heavy helicopters than competitors, which also include the existing Bell Boeing V22 tilt-rotor aircraft.

"All big helicopter manufacturers are looking for more distance and more speed," Bertling told reporters. "It only makes sense to increase speed if in the end what you gain is not over-compensated by increased cost."

The X3 is, for now, simply a technology demonstrator meaning that, if successful, the concept can be applied to helicopters which could be sold in their usual form or with X3-type wings.

Eurocopter refused to give figures on development costs or market potential but said such a helicopter might typically cost 20-25 percent more and go 50 percent faster than a normal type.

Target markets include long-distance search and rescue, inter-city shuttle services or military uses including special forces operations. The wing-mounted propellers would be disengaged when the helicopter lands to avoid injury.

Aug 26th

Future Aircraft

By Aman Kumar
Future Aircraft
Boeing Sonic Cruiser concept
BOEING SONIC CRUISER CONCEPT
 Airbus and Boeing Future Airliners Information and Facts...

There are as yet no official plans for any Boeing 797. Up until a couple years ago, most people believed Boeing's next major project might be a follow-on to the 747 to compete with Airbus's super-jumbo A380. While Boeing pushed developing an upgraded 747 model, most airlines indicated that they would prefer an entirely new design instead. The only publicly released concept I've come across for this potential new-build aircraft is shown below. Boeing's internal designation for this design study was the 763-246C. If it had gone into production, it would likely have been rechristened the 797 to conform to the standard Boeing naming convention. Now that the 787 designation has been assigned, any new replacement that Boeing might launch to replace the 747 would probably be called the 797. Once the 7-7 designations are exhasted, it is unknown what convention Boeing might adopt next. Possibilities include 8-8 or maybe 7--7. Only time will tell.
Boeing 763-246C
Boeing 763-246C
As illustrated in the following image, the 763 concept not only provided room for 450 to 550 passengers, but could be equipped with sleeping berths in an upper deck for longer intercontinental routes up to 9,000 nm (16,740 km).
Boeing 763-246C internal cross-section
Boeing 763-246C internal cross-section
Nevertheless, Boeing abandoned both the upgraded 747 and any potential replacements, at least temporarily, when it announced plans to focus on a completely different market for its next major project. Instead of building a very large jetliner to carry 500 or more passengers, Boeing believed a more lucrative market existed in carrying about 250 passengers over very long ranges at higher speeds than is possible with conventional airliner designs. This philosophy was reflected in the Sonic Cruiser concept unveiled in early 2001. This aircraft would have been a competitor in the 767 and A310 class of airliners.
Boeing Sonic Cruiser concept
The Sonic Cruiser created somewhat of a sensation when first announced, but airlines and Boeing became progressively less enthusiastic over the ensuing months. The aircraft would require rather substantial improvements in technology to achieve its stated goals of cruising at about Mach 0.95, compared to Mach 0.8 for most commercial airliners, over a range between 6,000 nm and 10,000 nm (11,120 km to 18,530 km). This kind of technological advancement could well drive up the cost so much that most airlines showed no willingness to commit to the idea. Even the percieved advantage of a faster commercial aircraft caused concern because of all the scheduling difficulties it would raise. The terrible financial situation of the airlines after September 11 only worsened prospects for launching the design. Due to this lackluster response and its inability to make a strong business case for the aircraft, Boeing officially shelved the Sonic Cruiser concept in December 2002.
In its place, the company has decided to refocus its attention on a conventional 250-seat design that had been under consideration in tandem with the Sonic Cruiser. The conventional design, originally known as Project Yellowstone, will cruise in the Mach 0.8 region but incorporate advanced "super-efficient" technologies to significantly lower operating costs in comparison with today's airliners. However, the new airliner is apparently not to be known as the 787 but has been designated the 7E7, E standing for Efficient. We now know that the 7E7 designation was only temporary and the new Boeing aircraft has been officially renamed the 787. Since the basic designs of both the 767 and A310 are getting upwards of 25 or 30 years in age, a replacement in that market is probably a wise move on Boeing's part. In addition, the potential savings in operational costs offered by the new efficient technologies are very appealing to cost-concious airlines.
airbus a370
airbus a360
boeing 797
boeing 700
Blended Wing Body concept
Blended Wing Body concept
A completely different path that Boeing may choose to pursue in the near future is the Blended-Wing-Body, or BWB. Despite your rather unappreciative comments, some of our staff have had the opportunity to meet with and talk to one of the concept's creators, and we've found it to be a most interesting design. The BWB is related to the flying wing, but is a somewhat more sophisticated concept that resulted from a study to determine the optimum low-drag shape to contain a given volume of passenger space. The resulting fuselage resembles a flattened sphere that tapers down and blends into the outboard wings, hence the name Blended-Wing-Body. The thick center-section could hold some 500 to 800 passengers, as illustrated below. Additional studies have focused on smaller variants in the 250- to 300-passenger range, and a recently reported study indicated that a cruise speed of Mach 0.9 over a range of 7,500 to 8,900 nm (13,875 to 16,465 km) might be an optimum design point.
Blended Wing Body internal layout
Blended Wing Body internal layout
The BWB was first created by the commercial aircraft division of McDonnell Douglas (MDD), a firm that was purchased by Boeing in the mid-1990s. Though Boeing expressed little interest in continuing most of MDD's projects, they have shown the foresight to carry on low-level development of the revolutionary BWB. However, Boeing has not yet provided any indication that the design will go into full-scale development or production. While such an aircraft could potentially reduce operating costs significantly, concerns have been raised about compatibility with existing airport infrastructure and the difficulty of evacuating so many people from the deep interior cabin in an emergency. In addition, many airlines are worried that passengers may be unwilling to fly an aircraft that is so different looking from what they are used to.
That pretty much sums up what we know of the possible future directions Boeing may take, but Airbus is even more of a mystery. The multinational conglomerate has focused so much of its efforts on developing the latest variants of the A330 and A340 as well as the completely new A380 that little is known of what its next big project might be.
Airbus A380
Airbus A380
The first mystery we can address is what happened to the designations in between A340 and A380. Airbus apparently conducted some sort of market research when looking for a name for its latest product, originally known as the A3XX. Immediately eliminated was the designation A370 since the number 7 is so often associated with rival Boeing. For whatever reasons, the numbers A350 and A360 were also deemed unpopular and appear to have been skipped, perhaps permanently. A380 was eventually selected primarily because the cross-sectional shape of the fuselage resembles the digit 8, but also because 8 is considered a special number in Asian cultures, the primary market at which the A380 is aimed. As for future projects, it was mentioned earlier that the A300/A310 series is nearing the end of its production run, and a replacement for this class of airliner is the most probable candidate. The company is considering a number of different options, including a stretched variant of the A320, known as the A322, or a shortened variant of the A330, dubbed the A330-500. However, a more likely possibility is a completely new class of airliners to fill the gap between the narrow-body A320 and widebody A330. If built, this class of airliners would probably include a shorter-range 200-passenger model and a longer-range 250-passenger model, both with a tentative service entry around 2010. This class of airliners has tentatively been named the A305, and no plans have yet been announced for any A390. Airbus has in fact committed to this new airliner, but it was given the designation A350 instead of A305. Again, this decision appears to have been made purely for marketing reasons as Airbus wanted to emphasize that the A350 is a new design and not merely an update to the aging A300 family.
Though this answer has included a number of possibilities and been vague on what might actually happen, you must remember that Boeing and Airbus are bitter rivals who purposefully obfuscate their intentions to keep each other off balance and maintain their competitive edge. As a result, we really have no idea what projects they might actually decide to pursue or when. We can only make our best educated guesses as to where the airline market is going and what classes of aircraft are likely to be in demand.
SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY THE JAPANESE
SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY A JAPANESE AEROSPACE COMPANY 
X-43 HYPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY NASA
X-43 HYPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY NASA 
THE VIRGIN HYPERSONIC SPACECRAFT
THE VIRGIN HYPERSONIC SPACECRAF
 
 
 
 
Aug 26th

COMPLETE LIST OF ALL CIVIL AIRCRAFT IN HISTORY

By Ram Kapoor

COMPLETE LIST OF ALL CIVIL AIRCRAFT IN HISTORY


A
AASI Jetcruzer Business and utility transport 
ACAC ARJ21 70-100 seat Regional airliner 
AEA Explorer Multirole utility transport 
Aermacchi AL-60 light aircraft 
Aermacchi SF.260 Two seat trainer and aerobatics light aircraft 
Aerion SBJ Planned supersonic business jet 
Aero A.10 biplane five passenger airliner 
Aero A.22 biplane two passenger airliner 
Aero A.23 biplane seven passenger airliner 
Aero A.34 two seat light aircraft 
Aero A.35 five passenger airliner 
Aero A.38 eight passenger airliner 
Aero A.200 light aircraft 
Aero A.204 eight passenger airliner prototype 
Aero Ae 45 & Ae 145 twin engine light aircraft 
Aero Boero AB-95/115 light utility aircraft 
Aero Boero AB-150 light utility aircraft 
Aero Boero AB-180 light utility aircraft 
Aero Boero AB-210 utility aircraft prototype 
Aero Boero 260AG agricultural aircraft 
Aero-Cam Slick 360 Single-seat aerobatics aircraft 
Aero Commander 100 Four seat light aircraft 
Aero Commander 500/600 series of twin engine piston & turboprop powered business & personal aircraft 
Aero Commander Jet Commander mid size business jet 
Aeronca 7 Champion Two seat light aircraft 
Aeronca 11 Chief Two seat light aircraft 
Aero Spacelines Guppy series very large propeller cargo aircraft 
Aérospatiale Alouette II & Lama Light utility helicopters 
Aérospatiale Alouette III Light utility helicopter 
Aérospatiale N 262 & Mohawk 298 Short range turboprop airliner 
Aerospatiale SA-330 Puma Twin engine medium lift helicopter 
Aerospatiale SA-341/342 Gazelle Utility helicopter 
Aérospatiale AS-350 Écureuil & AS-355 Écureuil 2 Light utility helicopters 
Aérospatiale SA-360/361/365C Dauphin Mid size utility helicopters 
Aérospatiale SN-601 Corvette Light corporate jet 
Aérospatiale-British Aerospace Concorde Medium range supersonic airliner 
Aerokopter AK1-3 "Sanka" Light two seats helicopter 
Agusta A109 Twin engined utility & corporate helicopter 
Agusta A119 Koala Light utility helicopter 
Ahrens AR 404 four engine turboprop utility aircraft 
Air Tractor series of piston & turboprop powered agricultural aircraft 
Airbus A300B2/B4 Medium range widebody airliner 
Airbus A300-600 Medium range widebody airliner 
Airbus Beluga very large cargo aircraft 
Airbus A310-200 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A310-300 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A318 100 seat regional airliner 
Airbus A319 Medium range airliner 
Airbus A319CJ Long range large corporate jet 
Airbus A320 Short to medium range airliner 
Airbus A321 Short to medium range narrowbody airliner 
Airbus A330-200 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A330-300 Large capacity medium to long range airliner 
Airbus A340-200 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A340-300 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A340-500 Ultra long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A340-600 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A350-800 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A350-900 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A350-1000 Long range widebody airliner 
Airbus A380 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Alpha 2000 The Robin R2000 now manufactured in New Zealand 
American Aviation AA-1 Yankee two seat light aircraft 
American Aviation AA-1A Trainer two seat light training aircraft 
American Aviation AA-2 Patriot four seat light aircraft prototype 
American Champion & Bellanca series Series of two seat utility and aerobatic light aircraft 
Antonov/PZL Mielec An-2 Biplane utility transport 
Antonov An-10 110 passenger turboprop 
Antonov An-12 turboprop cargo aircraft 
Antonov An-22 Antheus Large capacity turboprop cargo aircraft 
Antonov An-24 44-50 passenger airliner and utility aircraft 
Antonov/PZL Mielec An-28 Regional airliner and utility transport 
Antonov An-30 aerial survey aircraft 
Antonov An-38 Regional airliner and utility transport 
Antonov An-70 Heavylift propfan cargo aircraft 
Antonov An-72 & An-74 STOL capable utility transport 
Antonov An-124 Ruslan Heavylift freighter 
Antonov An-140 50 passenger short-range turboprop airliner 
Antonov An-225 Mriya Extra-Large cargo aircraft 
APM 20 Lionceau Very light utility aircraft 
APM 30 Lion Light utility aircraft 
Arado S I & S III two seat trainers 
Arado SC I two seat trainer 
Arado SC II two seat trainer 
Arado L I two seat light aircraft 
Arado L II two seat light aircraft 
Arado V I prototype four passenger airliner and air mail carrier 
Arado W 2 two seat seaplane trainer 
Armstrong Whitworth Ape experimental aircraft 
Armstrong Whitworth Argosy three engine biplane airliner 
Armstrong Whitworth Atalanta nine passenger four engine airliner 
Armstrong Whitworth Ensign 40 passenger four engine airliner 
Armstrong Whitworth A.W.52 flying wing experimental aircraft 
Armstrong Whitworth Argosy four engine turboprop cargo aircraft 
Arrow Sport two seat light aircraft 
Arrow Model F two seat light aircraft 
ATR ATR-42 42 seat turboprop regional airliner 
ATR ATR-72 70 seat turboprop regional airliner 
Auster J-1 Autocrat three seat light aircraft 
Auster J-1U Workmaster agricultural aircraft 
Auster J-2 Arrow two seat light aircraft 
Auster J-3 Atom two seat light aircraft 
Auster J-4 two seat light aircraft 
Auster Avis prototype light utility aircraft 
Auster Autocar four seat light aircraft 
Auster Aiglet Trainer aerobatic four seat light aircraft 
Auster Alpine four seat light aircraft 
Auster B.4 prototype light cargo aircraft 
Auster Agricola agricultural aircraft 
Auster D.4 two seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-1 two seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-5 two seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-9 two seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-10 single seat aerobatic aircraft 
Avia BH-12 two seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-16 single seat light aircraft 
Avia BH-20 two seat trainer 
Avia BH-25 biplane airliner 
Avia 14 28 passenger airliner 
Aviat Husky Two seat utility light aircraft 
Aviat Pitts Special Single and two seat competition aerobatic biplanes 
Aviation Traders ATL-90 Accountant prototype 28 passenger turboprop airliner 
Aviation Traders ATL-98 Carvair Freighter/utility transport 
Avro Baby single seat light aircraft 
Avro Avian two seat light aircraft 
Avro 618 Ten ten passenger airliner 
Avro 652 four passenger airliner 
Avro York four engine airliner & cargo aircraft 
Avro Tudor four engine airliner 
Avro 748 (a.k.a. HS 748 & BAe 748) 50 seat turboprop airliner 
Avro RJ Series See British Aerospace BAe 146 
Avro Canada Jetliner prototype jet airliner 
Ayres Let L 610 40 seat regional airliner 
Ayres Thrush & Rockwell Thrush Commander Agricultural aircraft

B
BAC One-Eleven Short haul airliner 
Baade B-152 also known as Dresden 152 was the first German passenger jet airliner 
Beagle Airedale Four seat light aircraft 
Beagle D5 Husky Light aircraft 
Beagle Pup Two, three and four place light aircraft 
Beagle Terrier three seat light aircraft 
Beagle B.206 Six/eight place cabin twin 
Bede BD-1 two place prototype design 
Bede BD-5 single seat sport aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing high performance light aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 18 Twin Beech Light utility transport 
Beechcraft Model 19 Musketeer Four seat light aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 23 Sundowner Four seat light aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 24 Sierra Four seat light aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 33, 35 & 36 Bonanza Four & six seat high performance light aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 50 Twin Bonanza Six place light business twin 
Beechcraft Model 55, 56 & 58 Baron Four or six place light business twin 
Beechcraft Model 60 Duke Four or six place high performance twin 
Beechcraft Model 65, 70, 80, 85 & 88 Queen Air Utility, light executive transport, commuter airliner, Air Ambulance 
Beechcraft Model 76 Duchess Four place light twin 
Beechcraft Model 77 Skipper Two seat pilot training aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 90 King Air 6-10 seat Executive Transport, Commuter Airliner, Air Ambulance, Freight Transport 
Beechcraft Model 95 Travel Air Four place light twin 
Beechcraft Model 99 Airliner 19 seat Commuter Airliner 
Beechcraft Model 100 King Air 8-12 seat Executive Transport, Commuter Airliner, Air Ambulance, Freight Transport 
Beechcraft Model 200 (Super) King Air 8-12 seat Executive Transport, Commuter Airliner, Air Ambulance, Freight Transport, Aerial Survey Aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 300 (Super) King Air 8-14 seat Executive Transport, Commuter Airliner, Air Ambulance, Freight Transport, Aerial Survey Aircraft 
Beechcraft Model 1300 Airliner 13 seat Commuter Airliner 
Beechcraft Model 1900 Airliner 19 seat Regional Airliner and Corporate Transport 
Beechcraft Model 400 Beechjet light corporate jet 
Beechcraft Starship 2000 Advanced technology corporate transport 
Bell 47 Two or three seat light utility helicopter 
Bell 204 & 205 Medium Lift Utility helicopter 
Bell 206 JetRanger Light utility helicopter 
Bell 206L LongRanger Light utility helicopter 
Bell 212 Twin TwoTwelve Medium lift utility helicopter 
Bell 214B and 214ST Medium transport helicopter 
Bell 222 & 230 Twin engine light utility helicopters 
Bell 407 Seven place utility helicopter 
Bell 412 Medium lift utility helicopter 
Bell 427 Light twin utility helicopters 
Bell 429 Light/intermediate twin utility helicopters 
Bell 430 Twin engine intermediate size helicopter 
Bell BA 609 Six to nine seat corporate/utility tiltrotor 
Bell 206LT TwinRanger & Tridair Gemini ST Twin engine light utility helicopters 
Beriev Be-30/Be-32 Regional airliner and utility transport 
Beriev Be-103 Firefighting and Multirole Maritime Amphibian 
Beriev Be-112 Firefighting and Multirole Maritime Amphibian 
Beriev Be-200 Firefighting and multirole amphibian 
Beriev Be-2500 Proposed amphibian freighter 
Boeing Model 40 biplane air mail carrier/airliner 
Boeing Model 80 biplane airliner 
Boeing Model 221 air mail carrier 
Boeing 247 propeller airliner 
Boeing 307 Stratoliner propeller airliner 
Boeing 314 Clipper FLying boat airliner 
Boeing 367-80 jet transport development aircraft 
Boeing 377 Stratocruiser propeller airliner 
Boeing 707-100 Medium to long range airliner and freighter 
Boeing 717 Short to medium range airliner 
Boeing 720 Medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 727-100 Short to medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 727-200 Short to medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 737-100/200 Short range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 737-300/400/500 Short to medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 737-600/700 Short to medium range airliners 
Boeing 737-800/900 Short to medium range airliners 
Boeing 747-100 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 747-200 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 747-300 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 747-400 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 747-8 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 747SP Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 757-200 Medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 757-300 Medium range narrowbody airliner 
Boeing 767-200 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Boeing 767-300 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Boeing 767-400 Medium to long range widebody airliner 
Boeing 777-200 Long and ultra long range widebody airliners 
Boeing 777-300 Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 787-3 Medium range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 787-8 Long to Ultra-Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing 787-9 Long to Ultra-Long range high capacity widebody airliner 
Boeing Business Jet Long range large capacity corporate jet 
Boeing 2707 Supersonic transport project 
Boeing Vertol (Kawasaki) KV 107 Medium to heavylift utility helicopter 
Boeing Commercial Chinook Heavylift utility and airliner helicopter 
Boeing/MDHS/Hughes 500 Light utility helicopters 
Boeing MD 520N Light utility helicopter 
Boeing MD 600N Eight place light utility helicopter 
Boeing MD Explorer Light twin helicopter 
Boeing Stearman Two seat sport, utility and agricultural biplane 
Bombardier BD-100 Challenger 300 Super mid size corporate jet 
Bombardier CL600 Challenger 600/601/604/605 long range corporate jets 
Bombardier Challenger 850 large long range corporate jet 
Bombardier Global 5000 long range high capacity corporate jet 
Bombardier BD-700 Global Express Ultra long range, high speed, high capacity corporate jet 
Bombardier Learjet 40 small corporate jet 
Bombardier Learjet 45 Mid-size corporate jet 
Bombardier Learjet 55 & 60 Mid-size corporate jets 
Brantly B-2 & 305 Light piston powered utility helicopters 
Bristol 167 Brabazon long range airliner 
Bristol 170 Freighter Short range freighter/utility transport 
Bristol 175 Britannia long range turboprop airliner 
British Aerospace Jetstream 31 18 seat regional turboprop airliner 
British Aerospace Jetstream 41 29 seat regional turboprop airliner 
British Aerospace/Hawker Siddeley 748 Turboprop Regional airliner 
British Aerospace ATP Turboprop powered regional airliner 
British Aerospace BAe 125 Mid-size corporate jet 
British Aerospace BAe 146 four engined regional jet airliner 
Britten-Norman BN-2 Islander Commuter airliner and light utility transport 
Britten-Norman BN-2A Mk III Trislander Commuter airliner

C
Canadair CL-215 & Canadair CL-415 Firebomber and utility amphibian 
Canadair CL-44 & Yukon Medium to long range airliner and freighter 
Canadair CL-600 Challenger 600 Medium to long range widebody corporate jet 
Canadair CL-600 Challenger 601 & 604 Long range widebody corporate jets 
Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-100 & 200 Regional jet airliner 
Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-700 70 seat regional jet airliner 
CAP Aviation CAP-10/20/21/230/231/232 Single and two seat aerobatic light aircraft 
CASA C212 Aviocar STOL turboprop regional airliner and utility transport 
CASA/IPTN CN235 Utility transport and 45 seat regional airliner 
Cessna 120 
Cessna 140 
Cessna 150 & Cessna 152 Two seat primary and aerobatic capable trainers 
Cessna 170 Four seat light aircraft 
Cessna 172 Skyhawk 
Cessna 175 Skylark Four seat light aircraft 
Cessna 177 Cardinal and Cardinal RG Four seat light aircraft 
Cessna 180 & 185 Skywagon Four to six seat utility light aircraft 
Cessna 182 High performance four seat light aircraft 
Cessna 188 AGwagon, AGpickup, AGtruck, and AGhusky series of agricultural aircraft 
Cessna 205, 206 & 207 Six seat utility light aircraft 
Cessna 208 Caravan I, Grand Caravan & Cargomaster Single turboprop utility transport 
Cessna 210 Centurion High performance four to six seat light aircraft 
Cessna 310 & 320 Skynight Four to six seat light piston twins 
Cessna 336 & 337 Skymaster Six seat light piston twins 
Cessna 340 & 335 Six seat business twins 
Cessna 404 Titan Ten place corporate, commuter and freighter transport 
Cessna 411, 401 & 402 Freighter, 10 seat commuter, or six to eight seat business twins 
Cessna 421 & 414 Pressurised six to eight seat cabin twins 
Cessna 500 & 501 Citation, Citation I & Citation I/SP Light corporate jets 
Cessna 550 Citation II & 551 Citation II & Bravo Light corporate jets 
Cessna 560 Citation V, Ultra & Ultra Encore Small to midsize corporate jet 
Cessna 560XL Citation Excel Small to mid size corporate jet 
Cessna 650 Citation III, VI & VII Medium size corporate jets 
Cessna 680 Citation Sovereign Mid size corporate jet 
Cessna Citation X Long range, high speed, mid size corporate jet 
Cessna CitationJet, CJ1 & CJ2 Light corporate jets 
Cessna Corsair, Caravan II Turboprop powered executive transports 
Cessna Conquest, Conquest I & II Turboprop powered executive transports 
Cessna T303 Crusader Six seat corporate and utility transport 
Chichester-Miles Leopard High performance jet powered four seat light aircraft 
Cirrus SR20/22 Four seat high performance light aircraft 
Citabria series of tandem 2 seat high wing, aerobatic, utility and STOL aircraft 
Christen Eagle, aerobatic kit aircraft, based on Pitts Special 
Columbia 400 Four seat high performance light aircraft 
Commander 114B Four seat high performance light aircraft 
Concorde 
Conroy CL-44-0 Skymonster Large freighter 
Convair 240/340/440 Short haul commercial transports 
Convair CV-540/580/600/640/5800 Short haul turboprop converted commercial ransports 
Curtiss C46 Commando Freighter
Aug 22nd

Tech facts about boeing A/c

By Rahul S
Boeing makes jets that weigh almost 900,000 pounds (408,240 kilograms) fully loaded, and yet they fly in the sky like birds. That alone is pretty amazing.

But the miracle of flight is only one of hundreds of technological wonders at Boeing. Here are a few more that are sure to amaze you:

In 1998, airplane operations and maintenance documents required 310 million pieces of paper. If stacked, the pages would be 24 miles (39 kilometers) high. By the end of 2004, Boeing expects to be able to allow customer to choose to replace most paper documents with electronic ones.

- A modern Boeing airplane with 70 percent of the seats occupied is more fuel efficient than a new automobile carrying two people.

- The air flowing through a 767-400ER engine at takeoff power could inflate the Goodyear Blimp in seven seconds.

- The Boeing 777 is the first jetliner to be 100 percent digitally designed using three-dimensional solids technology. Throughout the design process, the airplane was "preassembled" on the computer, eliminating the need for a costly, full-scale mock-up.

- Boeing's primary Product Development effort is the 7E7 -- an airplane that will travel as fast as today's fastest widebody jets (the Boeing 777 and 747 travel at Mach 0.85) but use 15 to 20 percent less fuel. The airplane will carry 200-250 passengers on routes as long as 7,500 nautical miles. It will achieve this unprecedented performance through advancements in engine, aerodynamic, material and systems technologies.

- Final assembly of the 717 takes place on a continuous moving line at the Boeing plant in Long Beach, Calif. -- just like an automobile factory. Airplanes move about one-half inch every minute during production.

- Today, customers can order more than 6.5 million different types of spare parts on the MyBoeingFleet.com Web site, which hosts more than 130,000 spare-parts transactions each week.

The current Boeing 747  is twice as quiet compared to the old 747 and 25 % more fuel efficient!!

the 757 operates at one of the higest airports in the world(bangda ,tibet at 14259 ft) without any problem!!!

The 757 and 767 are very familiar and so not ver difficult to get type rated in either .

The boeing 767 was the first plane to use raked wingtips hance fuel savings of 4 to 5 %

Source: Boeing

Aug 20th

Blackburn B.32 - Big Daddy Never Made It Off The Drawing Board

By Rekha Behra
Blackburn B.32 - Big Daddy Never Made It Off The Drawing Board


                                                                    
Many aircraft designs never made it as far as the production stage. But that does not mean that they did not contribute to furthering the development of the industry. Such was the case of the Blackburn B.32 flying boat.

Until the late 1940s, many air forces around the world still viewed the flying boat as an instrumental part of their force structure. The same applied to the civilian sector where the ‘Big Boat’ was considered the main asset for transportation.

The flying boats ability to take-off with a higher all-up-weight made it a perfect platform for long range operations over the sea lanes. It could also be employed in far off places, even those venues where no air strip was available.

The Royal Air Force [RAF] was the first air service to fully exploit the flying boat range and payload capacity. Although the RAF employed a long list of boats for maritime reconnaissance patrols during World War II, its history is dominated by two main platforms, the invaluable Consolidated’s Catalina and the Short Brother’s Sunderland.

That did not mean that other, promising airplane designs were not pursued. In fact, no less than 55 flying boat blue prints were submitted between June 1938 and December 1944. Those designs, known by many historians as the ‘Unlucky Few’, were filled with promise but due to high costs associated with their development, most were discarded. One of the few that were able to gather enough momentum to gain pre-production funds from a cash-starved British Ministry of Defense [MoD] was the Blackburn B.32.

In July 1938, the MoD, through the Air Ministry, crafted Specification Order R.5/39 intended to develop the successor to the by-then venerable Sunderland. The Order called for a plane with a total serviceable load capacity of 5,000 pounds with a faster proposed speed than that of the Sunderland’s. To achieve this important requirement, the MoD stated that four power plants, generating upwards of 1,000 pounds of thrust should be installed.

By early 1939, the MoD added two additional requirements to the R.5/39. First, it must have a nominal range of at least 1,500 nautical miles while cruising at a minimum speed of 253mph. The other had to do with the fitting of a more robust offensive armament. The first version of the R.5 called for ‘only’ two forward firing heavy machine guns. In the 1939 modification, the Air Ministry asked for a 4 cannon, nose firing mechanism.

Four corporations submitted bids, but the most interesting of them all was that of Blackburn Aircraft. Tagged by the company as Project Project B.32, Blackburn’s proposal called for a revolutionary flying boat aircraft. It would achieve a long sought after balance between aerodynamic performance and in-water interaction.

The design featured many innovating aspects such as a tailplane with a pronounced dihedral which would have increased the clearance between the outer surface of the structure and the wave formation trailing from the main step. This, on paper, would have kept hull depth at a minimum, which would have enabled the aircraft to takeoff in a relative short time. All tip floats, retractable or fixed, where implemented as wingtips. The structure was augmented by slotted flaps.

To achieve the speed profiled on the R.5, the designers chose the Hercules power plant instead of the most popular Griffon engine. The four engines were to be fitted forward to the leading edges of the wing structure in order that the full slipstream effect on list was present at the moment of takeoff. Bombs could be fitted in three different compartments or cells. Cells were located at each center plane while bombs could also be carried on swinging carriers at both ends of the hull.

Armament consisted of a four cannon turret mounted between the two main wing spars. It had a 12-feet diameter cupola, shaped in the form of a sphere rotation in conjunction with the turret. A pillar-mounted cannon was fitted in the tail turret.

Total fuel load was to be 3,190 gallons, giving the aircraft a theoretical maximum operating range of 4,080 miles. The cruising speed was determined to be 262 mph at a 2,000′ operational ceiling. Top serviced ceiling was 30,700”. Climb rate was slated at 1,830′.

The final design was ready for pre-production mock-up trials when fate intervened. In April 1939, the British government decided that it would be a most costly-saving proposition to buy Catalinas than to develop their own advanced version. Quantity triumphed quality.

Still, the B.32 effort was not forgotten as several of its innovating features such as the dihedral pronounced tailplane, had been a stable of many second generation flying boats designs ever since.