Oct 28th

General Aviation In India, Growth, Opportunities And Challenges

By Aman Kumar

General Aviation In India, Growth, Opportunities And Challenges


Introduction

Aviation normally connotes a dichotomous division into: 
• Civil Aviation 
• General Aviation.

Civil aviation is further classified into: 
• Military 
• Government and private airline companies (airliners).

General Aviation deals with private aircraft owners, aircrafts owned by companies, flying clubs, small taxi operators etc. Thus, General Aviation includes all aircrafts not flown by the government and private airline companies called scheduled operators and/or the military.

General Aviation (GA) is also considered as a catalyst for economic growth. Businesses that use general aviation are said to gain competitive advantage, while communities gain job opportunities and access to the nation's extended air transportation system.

It benefits the users of transportation services and the country's economy at large. It increases the efficiency and productivity of businesses by reducing travel time that would be required to drive or to use more congested commercial airports. It provides training for a majority of new pilots.

Companies/ Government Agencies can use airplanes/ helicopter to: 
• For corporate Use 
• Offshore purposes especially helicopters 
• Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 
• Disaster Management 
The latest statistics for the civil aviation sector depict: 
• FDI up to 100 per cent is allowed under the automatic route for Greenfield projects. 
• For existing projects, FDI up to 100 per cent is allowed; while investment up to 74 per cent under the automatic route and beyond 74 per cent under the government route.

The Indian aviation industry is one of the fastest-growing aviation industries in the world with private airlines accounting for more than 75 per cent of the sector of the domestic aviation market (as of 2006). A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18 per cent and 454 airports and airstrips in place in the country, of which 16 are designated as international airports, the time has come to monitor the increasing growth of aviation sector.

Today, the General aviation sector is most neglected in the civil aviation industry. It is treated as a step child of aviation in India. There are no separate guidelines for general aviation. In India there is no concept of FBO's (Fixed Base Operator), helicopters or GA (General Aviation) terminals. Maximum use of General Aviation is in corporate charters, followed by offshore operations through helicopters, tourism etc. In the private charter industry itself there is an estimated business of Rs.2900 crores and it should not be neglected. General Aviation in India is a very niche market, especially since it is hassle free and has instant availability status. The value additional benefits of private aircraft are that it can fly to destinations not covered by scheduled airlines, has access to over 400 air strips (Only 90 are operational right now). The versatility of helicopters of reaching where nothing else can is not being exploited to its best potential.

The reasons which have lead to the poor growth of general aviation are mainly:

Lack of infrastructure- There is non-availability of FBO's (Fixed Base Operator), terminals. The numbers of agencies for ground handling are extremely restricted, there is non-availability of MRO'S (Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul) and increases cost of maintenance. There is no separate parking and the helicopters are operating out of airports. There are no heliports and heli-routes in India till date.

Restrictive regulations- Too many agencies are involved in the procedure of getting a private aircraft such as Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, and Airport Authority of India. 25% of duty is only restricted only to the corporate aircrafts, which increases costs. The owner has to restrict himself to operational timings at major metros, which renders private ownership useless.

Lack of Manpower- There is shortage of pilots and engineers. In India there are 35 flying schools, which are not producing the required number of pilots. There is a demand of about 50,000 employees and 15000 engineers in the airline industry.

The general aviation sector still has large scope for growth, by the intervention of private players and the availability of the purchasing power among the classes. The Business Aviation Association of India estimates that general aviation in that country is likely to grow by 30% to 40%. With more than 700,000 Indians accounting for a cumulative wealth of $3 billion, this comes as no surprise. Deregulation, availability of finances, eased regulations for foreign investment in Indian companies, and paradoxically, the painful experience of travel on a commercial jet are driving this growth.

The Road Ahead

Investment opportunities of US$ 110 billion are being envisaged up to 2020 with US$ 80 billion towards new aircraft and US$ 30 billion towards development of airport infrastructure, according to the Investment Commission of India.

• Indian aerospace companies are growing too. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was ranked 40th in Flight International's list of the top 100 aerospace companies last year. 
• Aircraft manufacturing major, Boeing, is in the process of setting up the US$ 100 million proposed Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MRO) facilities in Delhi. Air India is also in the process of launching a Cargo Hub in Nagpur while Deccan Aviation has already started one from the city. 
• GE Aviation and Air India will jointly invest US$ 90 million to set up a maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) facility in Mumbai. 
• Indocopters Private Ltd, distributor for Eurocopter helicopters in India, is planning to set up a helicopter maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) facility in Bhubaneswar, the company's fourth service centre in the country.

Conclusion

General aviation is growing rapidly both in the developed and developing countries. India's general aviation has failed to keep pace with the rest of the world due to general misconceptions, non-awareness and miscommunication between government and public and lack of infrastructure.

With 83,000 billionaires in India, and growing at the rate of 20% per year, the potential is amazing. Yet, there is a strong belief in India that the aircraft is a luxury item. Realistically speaking, an aircraft is not a luxury item. In fact it can contribute to an organisation operating more efficiently with many financial, economic and social benefits. It can give a multi- utilitarian denomination to the market.

The impediment in developing the general aviation in India is the lack of development map as to how this industry will grow. The necessary infrastructure in all its manifestations is either nonexistent or woefully inadequate.

Oct 23rd

Married at the plane while flying wing

By Aman Kumar

Married at the plane while flying wing


Marriage is one of the most memorable thing in the lives of everyone. Many things are prepared to make the moment more memorable and unforgettable for life. This same circuitry that is felt by the couple Darren McWalters and Katie Hodgson who wants her wedding to be such a moment that will never be forgotten throughout his life. But the most surprising, a marriage that is usually carried out can be a calm atmosphere did not occur in the atmosphere of this couple's wedding.


This couple chose to make their wedding as a marriage of the most thrilling in history. Both bride solemnize their wedding in the wings of aircraft flying at an altitude of 1000 feet or about 300 meters from the ground.

A much more tense again, not only one aircraft used in such marriages, but three aircraft simultaneously. Respectively for men and women and the bride one more aircraft to the priest who blesses the marriage.

The groom, McWalters, standing on top of a double-winged airplane wing, while Katie Hodgson also stood in the wing of another plane. Both were wearing full bridal gown. Meanwhile, the pastor George Bringham flew with the third plane was also standing in the wings. Bringham carrying biplane aircraft which was there in front of the bride and groom.

All three aircraft have the same hue, white and red stripes is owned by Team Guinot, a group which is also a collection of pilots aerobatic stuntpilot.

Television stations showed pictures of wedding dress Hodgson Sky showed fluttering of the plane airborne in weather that was not good.

Strong winds and rain also forced a third plane was not allowed to linger on the air. Third thrilling action perpetrator confessed violent crushing hit by strong winds.

In the air, Bringham marry them with the help of loudspeakers. Both bride even had to promise to shouting. That is, for both wedding vows can be heard by the guests below.

Create a special microphone attached to invited guests at the airport Rendcomb, which is about 145 km north west London, could hear the promise of marriage. "Will you love and keep it throughout your lives?" Bringham yelled.

"Yes, I will," promised Darren McWalters, his voice no less powerful.

Katie Hodgson admitted never imagined getting married on the wings of airplanes. "After getting older, I become more pleased with the adventure," he said.

"I bring the adventurous side of Darren. She was previously afraid of heights," he said.

Darren McWalters agree with Katie Hodgson. "We were both a little crazy, so we want something that fits," he said.

Oct 18th

Co50 Is An Personal Plane For Tomorrow

By Aman Kumar

Cobalt Aircraft’s Co50 Is An Personal Plane For Tomorrow


Cobalt Aircraft, Co50, personal airplane
The French company, Cobalt Aircraft, has unveiled what comes out to be an answer to the wide selection of fast, personal airplanes from companies like Cirrus and Cessna: Cobalt Co50 Concept. Screaming through the sky with the next generation piston powered turbocharged engine, Co50 features TCM’s 350-hp twin-turbo-charged TSIOF-550-D2B that enables it to hit 245 KTAS at 8,000 feet with a range of more than 1150 miles.

Cobalt Aircraft, Co50, personal airplane
Concept plane features clean sheet design, one of the widest cabins in its class at 1.34m, hand-stitched leather upholstery adding more to its elegance and style while ensuring safety at the same time. The concept plane was showed up at in Oshkosh isn’t quite done yet and lot more remains incomplete before it finally takes to the skies.
Cobalt Aircraft, Co50, personal airplane

Cobalt Aircraft, Co50, personal airplane

Cobalt Aircraft, Co50, personal airplane

Oct 17th

Air Alien Green Helicopter

By Aman Kumar

Air Alien Green Helicopter Concept By Cikaric Dragan


Air Alien Green Helicopter, Cikaric Dragan
Designed by Cikaric Dragan, this Air Alien Green Helicopter concept is powered by an electric motor and comprises a stator with two large electromagnetic rings. Its two giant fuel tanks filled with hydrogen and oxygen generate electricity for the electric motor.

The helicopter has two propellers with permanent magnetic rings rotating separately against each other. It’s a zero emission helicopter with magnetic levitation properties that produce very little noise, making it an ideal safari. Checkout more images after the jump.
air-alien-green-futuristic-helicopter-02.jpg
The whole operation of the helicopter is controlled by a computer. The helicopter has a four feet structure that has a duel role – works as leg flaps when helicopter is lifted above the ground and landing gears when it lends.
Air Alien Green Helicopter, Cikaric Dragan
Additionally, the angle of the legs is also a key factor for generating speed and to turn helicopter in the desired direction. The whole helicopter will be made from carbon fiber and that is going to play a major role in making this machine more efficient.
Air Alien Green Helicopter, Cikaric Dragan

Air Alien Green Helicopter, Cikaric Dragan

Oct 12th

Airbus Unveils Leaner, Cleaner And Quieter Futuristic Plane Of The Future

By Aman Kumar

Airbus Unveils Leaner, Cleaner And Quieter Futuristic Plane Of The Future


Futuristic Plane, Future Aviation, Airbus Concept Plane
Our future, by and large depends on fuel efficiency, and if you think what flying in future would be like; Airbus is to give you a glimpse. The plane maker has unveiled a fantasy plane at the Farnborough Airshow in the UK. The lightweight plane’s ultra-long, slim bent-back wings, a U-shaped tail and light-weight ‘intelligent’ body will add to the ‘eco efficiency factor’ as the concept consumes less fuel, produces little emissions and creates less noise in comparison to its current counterparts.

Futuristic Plane, Future Aviation, Airbus Concept Plane
The futuristic concept which is to fly in 2050, or even in 2030 if the technology continues to develop at the present rate, features morphing seats made from ecological, self-cleaning materials and walls and floor that become transparent with the touch of a button, giving 360 degree view of the world below.
Futuristic Plane, Future Aviation, Airbus Concept Plane
Additionally, there are holographic projections of virtual decor that allow the passengers to convert their private cabin into an office, bedroom or Zen garden.

Oct 2nd

BA flight to New York in emergency landing at Heathrow

By Aman Kumar

BA flight to New York in emergency landing at Heathrow

Boeing 747 (Library)

The aircraft landed safely at Heathrow

A British Airways jumbo jet with 296 people on board had to make an emergency landing shortly after taking off from Heathrow airport.

The Boeing 747, destined for New York, was over London at 0920 BST when a light in the cockpit indicated that one of the doors was not completely closed.

Wimbledon residents reported a low-flying aircraft as the jet turned and headed back to Heathrow.

The flight, BA117, landed safely at the west London airport.

In total the plane was airborne for 11 minutes.

Passengers were being put on another flight thought to be departing at 1500 BST.

'Smoke under wing'

Hannah Evershed was on board. She said: "It wasn't fun. I fly a lot for work and I knew we were flying too low.

"The pilot alerted the cabin crew over the loudspeaker to answer his calls. It all happened quite quickly."

Ms Evershed added: "Other passengers were quite calm but I was nervous.

"I'm travelling with my fiance and he saw smoke under the wing.

"We're waiting for engineers and hopefully we'll be on another flight this afternoon."

A British Airways spokeswoman said a full investigation was taking place.

She added: "Obviously it takes a bit of time to find another aircraft but we are looking to do that as soon as possible."

A spokeswoman for Heathrow operator BAA said the problem had been traced to a faulty light.

Oct 1st

Russian Flying Fortresses

By Aman Kumar

Russian Flying Fortresses

 

In 1930s Russian army was … by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet.

Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.

Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times.

Russian flying fortress 15


 

Russian flying fortress 2

 

Russian flying fortress 3

 

Russian flying fortress 4

 

Russian flying fortress 5

 

Russian flying fortress 6

 

Russian flying fortress 7

 

Russian flying fortress 8

 

Russian flying fortress 9

 

Russian flying fortress 10

 

Russian flying fortress 11

 

Russian flying fortress 12

 

Russian flying fortress 13

 

Russian flying fortress 14

 

Russian flying fortress 16

 

 

 



 
Sep 26th

Kingfisher flight (IT 3214) goes 'missing' for 30 minutes

By Aman Kumar
Kingfisher flight goes 'missing' for 30 minutes


A Kingfisher flight created panic after it lost radio contact with the Air Traffic Control (ATC) for around 30 minutes. Flight IT 3214 from Delhi to Bangalore could not be contacted for 30 minutes on Wednesday afternoon. The flight that lost contact during transition from the Delhi to Nagpur Air Traffic Control had over 150 passengers onboard. 

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has initiated a probe, even as sources say that the cockpit voice recorder and the black box will provide clues. 

Director General Naseem Zaidi said the air safety director will probe whether the incident involving the Delhi-Bangalore flight took place due to lapses in following standard operating procedures by pilots and ATC or due to a technical snag. 

According to sources, Kingfisher flight (IT 3214) took off from Delhi at 2.05 pm. “The flight was assigned 33,000 feet and was, initially, in contact with the Delhi ATC, which asked it to report to Nagpur area control as it flew southwards. Not only did the pilots failed to contact the controllers, but they also didn’t respond to calls on regular and emergency VHF frequencies by the ATC and other flights in the vicinity to establish contact with them,” sources said. 

However, the plane, which was being constantly tracked on the radar, maintained the assigned flight level, they added. 

When a flight switches over to another ATC unit, pilots are expected to inform the controllers about its flight level, call sign and a four digit squawk code assigned to them. 

“This information helps the controllers to verify whether or not it is the same aircraft that they are tracking on radar. However, IT 3214 failed to do so,’’ the source said. 

“After about 30 minutes the flight established contact with Nagpur controllers and sought a deviation from its route,’’ an official said. 

Pilots and air traffic controllers familiar with Nagpur said there are certain blind spots where VHF and radar coverage is poor. 

Some even suggested that Kingfisher pilots were monitoring wrong frequencies and were therefore unable to listen to calls made by Nagpur ATC. 

Kingfisher spokesperson said, “Preliminary indications are that the pilots reported bad weather and heavy static when they transitioned from Delhi area control to Nagpur area control. 

As soon as they were able to contact Nagpur, they sought and received a deviation to avoid the spot of weather. Further investigations are on.’’ 
Aug 26th

Future Aircraft

By Aman Kumar
Future Aircraft
Boeing Sonic Cruiser concept
BOEING SONIC CRUISER CONCEPT
 Airbus and Boeing Future Airliners Information and Facts...

There are as yet no official plans for any Boeing 797. Up until a couple years ago, most people believed Boeing's next major project might be a follow-on to the 747 to compete with Airbus's super-jumbo A380. While Boeing pushed developing an upgraded 747 model, most airlines indicated that they would prefer an entirely new design instead. The only publicly released concept I've come across for this potential new-build aircraft is shown below. Boeing's internal designation for this design study was the 763-246C. If it had gone into production, it would likely have been rechristened the 797 to conform to the standard Boeing naming convention. Now that the 787 designation has been assigned, any new replacement that Boeing might launch to replace the 747 would probably be called the 797. Once the 7-7 designations are exhasted, it is unknown what convention Boeing might adopt next. Possibilities include 8-8 or maybe 7--7. Only time will tell.
Boeing 763-246C
Boeing 763-246C
As illustrated in the following image, the 763 concept not only provided room for 450 to 550 passengers, but could be equipped with sleeping berths in an upper deck for longer intercontinental routes up to 9,000 nm (16,740 km).
Boeing 763-246C internal cross-section
Boeing 763-246C internal cross-section
Nevertheless, Boeing abandoned both the upgraded 747 and any potential replacements, at least temporarily, when it announced plans to focus on a completely different market for its next major project. Instead of building a very large jetliner to carry 500 or more passengers, Boeing believed a more lucrative market existed in carrying about 250 passengers over very long ranges at higher speeds than is possible with conventional airliner designs. This philosophy was reflected in the Sonic Cruiser concept unveiled in early 2001. This aircraft would have been a competitor in the 767 and A310 class of airliners.
Boeing Sonic Cruiser concept
The Sonic Cruiser created somewhat of a sensation when first announced, but airlines and Boeing became progressively less enthusiastic over the ensuing months. The aircraft would require rather substantial improvements in technology to achieve its stated goals of cruising at about Mach 0.95, compared to Mach 0.8 for most commercial airliners, over a range between 6,000 nm and 10,000 nm (11,120 km to 18,530 km). This kind of technological advancement could well drive up the cost so much that most airlines showed no willingness to commit to the idea. Even the percieved advantage of a faster commercial aircraft caused concern because of all the scheduling difficulties it would raise. The terrible financial situation of the airlines after September 11 only worsened prospects for launching the design. Due to this lackluster response and its inability to make a strong business case for the aircraft, Boeing officially shelved the Sonic Cruiser concept in December 2002.
In its place, the company has decided to refocus its attention on a conventional 250-seat design that had been under consideration in tandem with the Sonic Cruiser. The conventional design, originally known as Project Yellowstone, will cruise in the Mach 0.8 region but incorporate advanced "super-efficient" technologies to significantly lower operating costs in comparison with today's airliners. However, the new airliner is apparently not to be known as the 787 but has been designated the 7E7, E standing for Efficient. We now know that the 7E7 designation was only temporary and the new Boeing aircraft has been officially renamed the 787. Since the basic designs of both the 767 and A310 are getting upwards of 25 or 30 years in age, a replacement in that market is probably a wise move on Boeing's part. In addition, the potential savings in operational costs offered by the new efficient technologies are very appealing to cost-concious airlines.
airbus a370
airbus a360
boeing 797
boeing 700
Blended Wing Body concept
Blended Wing Body concept
A completely different path that Boeing may choose to pursue in the near future is the Blended-Wing-Body, or BWB. Despite your rather unappreciative comments, some of our staff have had the opportunity to meet with and talk to one of the concept's creators, and we've found it to be a most interesting design. The BWB is related to the flying wing, but is a somewhat more sophisticated concept that resulted from a study to determine the optimum low-drag shape to contain a given volume of passenger space. The resulting fuselage resembles a flattened sphere that tapers down and blends into the outboard wings, hence the name Blended-Wing-Body. The thick center-section could hold some 500 to 800 passengers, as illustrated below. Additional studies have focused on smaller variants in the 250- to 300-passenger range, and a recently reported study indicated that a cruise speed of Mach 0.9 over a range of 7,500 to 8,900 nm (13,875 to 16,465 km) might be an optimum design point.
Blended Wing Body internal layout
Blended Wing Body internal layout
The BWB was first created by the commercial aircraft division of McDonnell Douglas (MDD), a firm that was purchased by Boeing in the mid-1990s. Though Boeing expressed little interest in continuing most of MDD's projects, they have shown the foresight to carry on low-level development of the revolutionary BWB. However, Boeing has not yet provided any indication that the design will go into full-scale development or production. While such an aircraft could potentially reduce operating costs significantly, concerns have been raised about compatibility with existing airport infrastructure and the difficulty of evacuating so many people from the deep interior cabin in an emergency. In addition, many airlines are worried that passengers may be unwilling to fly an aircraft that is so different looking from what they are used to.
That pretty much sums up what we know of the possible future directions Boeing may take, but Airbus is even more of a mystery. The multinational conglomerate has focused so much of its efforts on developing the latest variants of the A330 and A340 as well as the completely new A380 that little is known of what its next big project might be.
Airbus A380
Airbus A380
The first mystery we can address is what happened to the designations in between A340 and A380. Airbus apparently conducted some sort of market research when looking for a name for its latest product, originally known as the A3XX. Immediately eliminated was the designation A370 since the number 7 is so often associated with rival Boeing. For whatever reasons, the numbers A350 and A360 were also deemed unpopular and appear to have been skipped, perhaps permanently. A380 was eventually selected primarily because the cross-sectional shape of the fuselage resembles the digit 8, but also because 8 is considered a special number in Asian cultures, the primary market at which the A380 is aimed. As for future projects, it was mentioned earlier that the A300/A310 series is nearing the end of its production run, and a replacement for this class of airliner is the most probable candidate. The company is considering a number of different options, including a stretched variant of the A320, known as the A322, or a shortened variant of the A330, dubbed the A330-500. However, a more likely possibility is a completely new class of airliners to fill the gap between the narrow-body A320 and widebody A330. If built, this class of airliners would probably include a shorter-range 200-passenger model and a longer-range 250-passenger model, both with a tentative service entry around 2010. This class of airliners has tentatively been named the A305, and no plans have yet been announced for any A390. Airbus has in fact committed to this new airliner, but it was given the designation A350 instead of A305. Again, this decision appears to have been made purely for marketing reasons as Airbus wanted to emphasize that the A350 is a new design and not merely an update to the aging A300 family.
Though this answer has included a number of possibilities and been vague on what might actually happen, you must remember that Boeing and Airbus are bitter rivals who purposefully obfuscate their intentions to keep each other off balance and maintain their competitive edge. As a result, we really have no idea what projects they might actually decide to pursue or when. We can only make our best educated guesses as to where the airline market is going and what classes of aircraft are likely to be in demand.
SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY THE JAPANESE
SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY A JAPANESE AEROSPACE COMPANY 
X-43 HYPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY NASA
X-43 HYPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN STUDY BY NASA 
THE VIRGIN HYPERSONIC SPACECRAFT
THE VIRGIN HYPERSONIC SPACECRAF
 
 
 
 
Aug 26th

BANKRUPT AIRLINES FROM AROUND THE WORLD

By Aman Kumar

1 - ALOHA AIRLINES
2 - CHAMPION AIRLINES
3 - ATA AIRLINES
4 - SKYBUS AIRLINES
5 - FRONTIER AIRLINES 
6 - SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AIRLINES IN THE UNITED STATES ARE LISTED FIRST...
OTHER COUNTRIES ARE LISTED IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES - AIRLINES

Aaxico Airlines (1946 - 1976, to Trans International Airlines)

Access Air (1998 - 2001)

Aeromech Airlines (1951 - 1983, to Wright Airlines)

Air America (owned and operated by the CIA in SouthEast Asia)

Air America (1980s)

Air Atlanta (1981 - 88)

Airborne Express (1946 - 2003, to DHL)

airborne express

Air California, later AirCal (1967 - 87, to American Airlines)

Air Chaparral (1980 - 82)

Air Florida (1972 - 84)

air florida airlines

Airlift International (1946 - 81)

Air Midwest (1965 - 91, to Mesa Airlines)

Air New England (1975 - 81)

Air Niagara

Air North (1963 - 83, to Brockway Air)

Air South (1968 - 75, to Florida Airlines; 1994-1997)

Allegheny Airlines (became US Airways)

American Overseas Airways

Arista International Airlines

Arizona Airways (1990s)

Aroostook Airways

Aspen Airways (1962 - 90)

Atlantic Coast Airlines (1989 - 2004, to Independence Air)

Bar Harbor Airlines (1971-92)

Boeing Air Transport (1927 - 30)

Bonanza Air Lines (1945 - 68) to Hughes Airwest

Braniff International Airways (1928 - 82 and 1984 - 89)

braniff airways airlines

Britt Airways

Cape Smythe Air (1975 - 2005, to Frontier Flying Service)

Capitol Air Lines (1970s-1980s)

Capital Airlines (1936 - 61, to United Airlines)

Capitol Air (1946 - 82)

Carnival Airlines

carnival airlines

Cascade Airways (1969 - 86)

Catalina Airlines (1940 - 69)

Central Airlines (1944 - 67)

Challenge Air Cargo (1978 - 2001)

Chicago and Southern Airlines (1934 - 53)

Chicago Express (1993 - 2005)

Colgan Airways (1971 - 86, to Presidential Airways, revived 1991)

Colonial Air Transport (1926 - 30)

Curtiss Flying Service (1929 - 32)

Eastern Airlines (1926 - 91)

eastern airlines

Emerald Air (1978 - 91)

Emery Worldwide Airlines (1977 - 2003)

Empire Air (1975 - 84, to USAir)

Flying Tiger Line (1945 - 88, to Federal Express)

flying tigers boeing 747

Freedom Airlines (2001 - 04, to Mesa Airlines, and resumed operations in October, 2005)

Galaxy Airlines

Global International Airways (1981 - ?)

Golden West Airlines

Great Plains Airlines (2001 - 2004)

Gulf Air Transport (1979 - 1990)

Hughes Airwest (1968 - 80, to Republic Airlines)

Imperial Airlines (1964 - 82)

Independence Air (2004-2006) (ceased operations in 2006)

Independence Air

Key Airlines

Kiwi International Airlines

Lake Central Airlines (1949 - 68, to Allegheny Airlines)

lake central airlines

Lakeland Airlines (1980 - 84)

Las Vegas Airlines (1973 - 87)

Legend Airlines (1996 - 2000)

Lone Star Airlines

Mackey Airlines (1957 - 81)

Maddux Airlines (1927 - 29)

Mall Airways (1973 - 89, to Business Express)

MarkAir (1947 - 95)

Marquette Airlines (to Trans World Airlines)

Mid Pacific Air (1981 - 88)

Mid-State Airlines (1964 - ?, to Sentry Airlines)

Midway Airlines (1979 - 81 and 1993 - 2003)

midway airlines md-80 series

Mississippi Valley Airlines (1969 - 85)

Modern Air Transport

Mohawk Airlines (1952 - 88, to Allegheny Airlines)

Morris Air to Southwest Airlines

Mountain Air Express

Muse Air to Southwest Airlines

National Air Cargo

National Airlines (1929 - 80, to Pan American World Airways; 1995 - 2002)

national airlines

National Air Transport (1926 - 30)

New York Air (1980 - 86, to Continental Airlines)

new york air

New York Airways (1949 - 1979)

New York, Rio, and Buenos Aires Line (to Pan American World Airways)

North Central Airlines (1953 - 79)

Northeast Airlines (1940 - 72,to Delta Air Lines)

Overseas National Airways (1950 - 78)

Ozark Airlines (1943 - 86, to Trans World Airlines)

Pacific Air Transport (1926 - 27)

Pacific Alaska Airways (1973 - 86)

Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) (1945 - 86, to USAir)

psa airlines

Pan American-Grace Airways (Panagra) (1928 - 67, to Braniff International Airways)

Pan American World Airways (1927 - 91)

pan am airlines

People Express (1981 - 87, to Continental Airlines)

people express airlines boeing 727

Piedmont Airlines (1940 - 89, to USAir)

Planet Airways (????- June 8, 2005, speculation only at this point in time)

Presidential Airways (1985 - 89)

Pride Air (August 1985 - November 1985)

Pro Air (1997 - 2000)

PBA - Provincetown - Boston Airline

Ransome Airlines (1967 - 86)

Reeve Aleutian Airways (1932 - 2001)

Reno Air (1990 - 99, to American Airlines)

Republic Airlines (1979 - 86, to Northwest Airlines)

republic airlines

Rich International Airways (1971 - 96)

Robertson Air Service

Rocky Mountain Airways (1964 - 86)

Saturn Airways (1960 - 76, to Aaxico Airlines)

Seaboard World Airlines (1946 - 80, to Flying Tiger Line)

seaboard world airlines dc-8

Shuttle by United and United Shuttle (1994 - 2001)

Southeast Airlines (1992-2004)

Southern Airways (1943 - 79, to Republic Airlines)

Standard Airlines (1926 - 30)

Swift Aire Lines (1969 - 81)

TAT - Maddux Air Lines (1928 - 30)

Texas Air

Texas International Airlines (1944 - 86, to Continental Airlines)

Tower Air (1983 - 2000)

Transamerica Airlines (1948 - 86)

transamerica airlines

Transcontinental Air Transport (1928 - 30)

TransMeridian Airlines (1995-2005)

Trans International Airlines (1947 - 1986)

TranStar Airlines (1981 - 87)

Trans-Texas Airways

Trans World Airlines (1930 - 2001, to American Airlines)

twa airlines

Trump Shuttle (1989 - 91, to US Airways)

Universal Airlines (US Cargo Operator 1966-72 to Trans International Airlines)

ValuJet Airlines (to AirTran Airways, 1997)

Vanguard Airlines (1994 - 2002)

Western Airlines (1925 - 87, to Delta Air Lines)

western airlines

Western Pacific Airlines (ceased operations 1998)

Wien Air Alaska

Wilmington - Catalina Air Line